The Autonomous Exploration for Gathering Increased Science (AEGIS) system enables automated data collection by planetary rovers. AEGIS software was uploaded to the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) mission’s Opportunity rover in December 2009 and has successfully demonstrated automated onboard targeting based on scientist-specified objectives. Prior to AEGIS, images were transmitted from the rover to the operations team on Earth; scientists manually analyzed the images, selected geological targets for the rover’s remote-sensing instruments, and then generated a command sequence to execute the new measurements. AEGIS represents a significant paradigm shift---by using onboard data analysis techniques, the AEGIS software uses scientist input to select high-quality science targets with no human in the loop. This approach allows the rover to autonomously select and sequence targeted observations in an opportunistic fashion, which is particularly applicable for narrow field-of-view instruments (such as the MER Mini-TES spectrometer, the MER Panoramic camera, and the 2011 Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) ChemCam spectrometer). This article provides an overview of the AEGIS automated targeting capability and describes how it is currently being used onboard the MER mission Opportunity rover.

This paper presents technology for performing autonomous commanding of a planetary rover. Through the use of AI planning, scheduling and execution techniques, the OASIS autonomous science system provides capabilities for the automated generation of a rover activity plan based on science priorities, the handling of opportunistic science, including new science targets identified by onboard data analysis software, other dynamic decision-making such as modifying the rover activity plan in response to problems or other state and resource changes. We first describe some of the particular challenges this work has begun to address and then describe our system approach. Finally, we report on our experience testing this software with a Mars rover prototype.

Researchers have previously described a mobile robot, or rover, operator's difficulty in accurately perceiving the rover's tilt and roll, which can lead to rollover accidents. Safe mobile robot navigation and effective mission planning also require an operator to accurately interpret and understand the geometry and scale of features in the rover's environment. This work presents an experiment that measures an observer's ability to estimate height of distant (5-15 m) obstacles given an accurate local model (e.g., within 0-5 m of the rover), a panoramic image, and a physical mock-up of the local terrain. The experimental conditions were intended to represent a best-case scenario for a stopped rover equipped with short base-line stereoscopic cameras. The participants' task was to extrapolate the well-modeled local geometry to monoscopic images of the more distant terrain. The experiment compared two estimation techniques. With the first technique, each observer physically indicated his or her direct estimates of the obstacle distance and height. With the second estimation technique, which we call horizon analysis, the observer indicated the position of the top and bottom of each rock on an image and the height was calculated by measuring the visual angle between the theoretical horizon and the points indicated by the observer. The direct estimation technique overestimated the height of the rocks by an average of 190%; the horizon analysis technique overestimated by 80%. The results suggest that even when provided with a rich set of supplementary and context information, rover operators have significant difficulty in vertically perceiving the scale of distant terrain. The results also suggest that horizon analysis is a more accurate method for determining the height of distant rover navigation obstacles, when the local terrain is nearly level.