Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rasmus Elsborg Madsen
dblp:86/5297
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 50% Data mining · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
document modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Modeling word burstiness using the Dirichlet distribution · ICML 2005 |
Data mining › probabilistic graphical models
dirichlet multinomial mixture |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Modeling word burstiness using the Dirichlet distribution · ICML 2005 |
Information retrieval › document processing › document analysis
document modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Modeling word burstiness using the Dirichlet distribution · ICML 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
perplexity evaluation · 0.1dirichlet distribution · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Modeling word burstiness using the Dirichlet distributionabstractMultinomial distributions are often used to model text documents. However, they do not capture well the phenomenon that words in a document tend to appear in bursts: if a word appears once, it is more likely to appear again. In this paper, we propose the Dirichlet compound multinomial model (DCM) as an alternative to the multinomial. The DCM model has one additional degree of freedom, which allows it to capture burstiness. We show experimentally that the DCM is substantially better than the multinomial at modeling text data, measured by perplexity. We also show using three standard document collections that the DCM leads to better classification than the multinomial model. DCM performance is comparable to that obtained with multiple heuristic changes to the multinomial model. 1. Rasmus Elsborg Madsen, David Kauchak, Charles Elkan |
ICML | 1 |
| 2004 | Pruning the vocabulary for better context recognitionabstractLanguage independent 'bag-of-words' representations are surprisingly effective for text classification. The representation is high dimensional though, containing many non-consistent words for text categorization. These non-consistent words result in reduced generalization performance of subsequent classifiers, e.g., from ill-posed principal component transformations. In this communication, our aim is to study the effect of reducing the least relevant words from the bag-of-words representation. We consider a new approach, using neural network based sensitivity maps and information gain for determination of term relevancy, when pruning the vocabularies. With reduced vocabularies, documents are classified using a latent semantic indexing representation and a probabilistic neural network classifier. Reducing the bag-of-words vocabularies with 90%-98%, we find consistent classification improvement using two mid size data-sets. We also study the applicability of information gain and sensitivity maps for automated keyword generation. Rasmus Elsborg Madsen, Sigurður Sigurðsson, Lars Kai Hansen, Jan Larsen |
IJCNN | 1 |