Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Markus Eisenbach 0002

dblp:86/6537-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-8805-8327ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 7 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers
High-performance computing · 93% Energy-efficient computing · 5% Emerging computing paradigms · 2%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
High-performance computing › supercomputing
exascale computing
1.322023
Experiences readying applications for Exascale · SC 2023
Frontier: Exploring Exascale · SC 2023
High-performance computing
performance optimization at scale
0.722023
Experiences readying applications for Exascale · SC 2023
New algorithm to enable 400+ TFlop/s sustained performance in simulations of disorder effects in high-Tc superconductors · SC 2008
High-performance computing › supercomputer architecture
exascale system architecture
0.712023
Frontier: Exploring Exascale · SC 2023
High-performance computing
supercomputing
0.712023
Experiences readying applications for Exascale · SC 2023
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry › molecular simulation › molecular dynamics
free energy estimation
0.112009
A scalable method for ab initio computation of free energies in nanoscale systems · SC 2009
Computational science and engineering › materials science
materials science simulation
0.112009
A scalable method for ab initio computation of free energies in nanoscale systems · SC 2009
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computing › quantum simulation
quantum monte carlo simulation
0.112008
New algorithm to enable 400+ TFlop/s sustained performance in simulations of disorder effects in high-Tc superconductors · SC 2008
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems
0.112008
New algorithm to enable 400+ TFlop/s sustained performance in simulations of disorder effects in high-Tc superconductors · SC 2008
Computational science and engineering
computational physics
0.012008
New algorithm to enable 400+ TFlop/s sustained performance in simulations of disorder effects in high-Tc superconductors · SC 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

performance tuning · 1.3early access system evaluation · 1.3wang-landau algorithm · 0.2locally self-consistent multiple scattering · 0.2mixed single-/double precision · 0.2delayed monte carlo updates · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Integrating quantum computing resources into scientific HPC ecosystems
Thomas L. Beck, Alessandro Baroni 0003, Ryan S. Bennink, Gilles Buchs, Eduardo Antonio Coello Pérez, Markus Eisenbach 0002, Rafael Ferreira da Silva, Muralikrishnan Gopalakrishnan Meena, Kalyana C. Gottiparthi, Peter Groszkowski, Travis S. Humble, Ryan Landfield, Ketan Maheshwari, Sarp Oral, Michael A. Sandoval, Amir Shehata, In-Saeng Suh, Christopher Zimmer 0001
Future Gener. Comput. Syst.6
2023 Frontier: Exploring Exascale
abstract
As the US Department of Energy (DOE) computing facilities began deploying petascale systems in 2008, DOE was already setting its sights on exascale. In that year, DARPA published a report on the feasibility of reaching exascale. The report authors identified several key challenges in the pursuit of exascale including power, memory, concurrency, and resiliency. That report informed the DOE's computing strategy for reaching exascale. With the deployment of Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Frontier supercomputer, we have officially entered the exascale era. In this paper, we discuss Frontier's architecture, how it addresses those challenges, and describe some early application results from Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility's Center of Excellence and the Exascale Computing Project.
Scott Atchley, Christopher Zimmer 0001, Jack Lange, David E. Bernholdt, Verónica G. Vergara Larrea, Michael J. Brim, Reuben D. Budiardja, Sunita Chandrasekaran, Markus Eisenbach 0002, Thomas M. Evans 0001, Matthew Ezell, Nicholas Frontiere, Antigoni Georgiadou, Joseph Glenski, Philipp Grete, Steven P. Hamilton, John K. Holmen, Axel Huebl, Daniel A. Jacobson, Wayne Joubert, Kim H. McMahon, Elia Merzari, Stan G. Moore, Andrew Myers 0001, Stephen Nichols, Sarp Oral, Thomas Papatheodore, Danny Perez, David M. Rogers 0001, Evan Schneider, Jean-Luc Vay, P. K. Yeung
SC10
2023 Experiences readying applications for Exascale
abstract
The advent of Exascale computing invites an assessment of existing best practices for developing application readiness on the world's largest supercomputers. This work details observations from the last four years in preparing scientific applications to run on the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility's (OLCF) Frontier system. This paper addresses a range of topics in software including programmability, tuning, and portability considerations that are key to moving applications from existing systems to future installations. A set of representative workloads provides case studies for general system and software testing. We evaluate the use of early access systems for development across several generations of hardware. Finally, we discuss how best practices were identified and disseminated to the community through a wide range of activities including user-guides and trainings. We conclude with recommendations for ensuring application readiness on future leadership computing systems.
Nicholas Malaya, O. E. Bronson Messer, Joseph Glenski, Antigoni Georgiadou, Justin Lietz, Kalyana C. Gottiparthi, Marcus S. Day, Jackie Chen, Jon S. Rood, Lucas Esclapez, James B. White III, Gustav R. Jansen, Nicholas Curtis, Stephen Nichols, Jakub Kurzak, Noel Chalmers, Chip Freitag, Paul T. Bauman, Alessandro Fanfarillo, Reuben D. Budiardja, Thomas Papatheodore, Nicholas Frontiere, Damon McDougall, Matthew R. Norman, Sarat Sreepathi, Philip C. Roth, Dmytro Bykov, Noah Wolfe, Paul Mullowney, Markus Eisenbach 0002, Marc T. Henry de Frahan, Wayne Joubert
SC30
2022 OpenMP application experiences: Porting to accelerated nodes
Seonmyeong Bak, Colleen Bertoni, Swen Böhm, Reuben D. Budiardja, Barbara M. Chapman, Johannes Doerfert, Markus Eisenbach 0002, Hal Finkel, Oscar R. Hernandez, Joseph Huber, Shintaro Iwasaki, Vivek Kale, Paul R. C. Kent, JaeHyuk Kwack, Meifeng Lin, Piotr Luszczek, Ye Luo 0001, Buu Pham, Swaroop Pophale, Kiran Ravikumar, Vivek Sarkar, Thomas Scogland, Shilei Tian, P. K. Yeung
Parallel Comput.7
2021 A scalable algorithm for the optimization of neural network architectures
Massimiliano Lupo Pasini, Junqi Yin, Ying Wai Li, Markus Eisenbach 0002
Parallel Comput.4
2009 A scalable method for ab initio computation of free energies in nanoscale systems
abstract
Calculating the thermodynamics of nanoscale systems presents challenges in the simultaneous treatment of the electronic structure, which determines the interactions between atoms, and the statistical fluctuations that become ever more important at shorter length scales. Here we present a highly scalable method that combines ab initio electronic structure techniques, we use the Locally Self-Consitent Multiple Scattering (LSMS) technique, with the Wang-Landau (WL) algorithm to compute free energies and other thermodynamic properties of nanoscale systems. The combined WL-LSMS code is targeted to the study of nanomagnetic systems that have anywhere from about one hundred to a few thousand atoms. The code scales very well on the Cray XT5 system at ORNL, sustaining 1.03 Petaflop/s in double precision on 147,464 cores.
Markus Eisenbach 0002, C.-G. Zhou, Donald M. C. Nicholson, Jeffrey M. Larkin, Thomas C. Schulthess
SC1
2008 New algorithm to enable 400+ TFlop/s sustained performance in simulations of disorder effects in high-Tc superconductors
abstract
Staggering computational and algorithmic advances in recent years now make possible systematic Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) simulations of high temperature (high-Tc) superconductivity in a microscopic model, the two dimensional (2D) Hubbard model, with parameters relevant to the cuprate materials. Here we report the algorithmic and computational advances that enable us to study the effect of disorder and nano-scale inhomogeneities on the pair-formation and the superconducting transition temperature necessary to understand real materials. The simulation code is written with a generic and extensible approach and is tuned to perform well at scale. Significant algorithmic improvements have been made to make effective use of current supercomputing architectures. By implementing delayed Monte Carlo updates and a mixed single-/double precision mode, we are able to dramatically increase the efficiency of the code. On the Cray XT4 systems of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), for example, we currently run production jobs on 31 thousand processors and thereby routinely achieve a sustained performance that exceeds 200 TFlop/s. On a system with 49 thousand processors we achieved a sustained performance of 409 TFlop/s. We present a study of how random disorder in the effective Coulomb interaction strength affects the superconducting transition temperature in the Hubbard model.
Gonzalo Alvarez 0001, Michael S. Summers, Don E. Maxwell, Markus Eisenbach 0002, Jeremy S. Meredith, Jeffrey M. Larkin, John M. Levesque, Thomas A. Maier, Paul R. C. Kent, Eduardo F. D'Azevedo, Thomas C. Schulthess
SC4