Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marzia Polito
dblp:86/750
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 25% Efficient and distributed learning · 22% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 19% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.7 | 2 | 2021 | LQF: Linear Quadratic Fine-Tuning · CVPR 2021 Mixed-Privacy Forgetting in Deep Networks · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | LQF: Linear Quadratic Fine-Tuning · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
machine unlearning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mixed-Privacy Forgetting in Deep Networks · CVPR 2021 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mixed-Privacy Forgetting in Deep Networks · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | LQF: Linear Quadratic Fine-Tuning · CVPR 2021 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
performance prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | The Fuzzy Correlation between Code and Performance Predictability · MICRO 2004 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | The Fuzzy Correlation between Code and Performance Predictability · MICRO 2004 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | An Improved Scheme for Detection and Labelling in Johansson Displays · NIPS 2003 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › motion analysis
human motion analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | An Improved Scheme for Detection and Labelling in Johansson Displays · NIPS 2003 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
loopy belief propagation |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | An Improved Scheme for Detection and Labelling in Johansson Displays · NIPS 2003 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Grouping and dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding · NIPS 2001 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning › nonlinear manifold learning
locally linear embedding |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Grouping and dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding · NIPS 2001 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Grouping and dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding · NIPS 2001 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
human pose estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | An Improved Scheme for Detection and Labelling in Johansson Displays · NIPS 2003 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Grouping and dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding · NIPS 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weight zeroing · 1.0linear approximation · 1.0influence functions · 0.6preconditioning · 0.5mean squared loss · 0.5kronecker factorization · 0.5Leaky ReLU · 0.5locally linear embedding · 0.1regression trees · 0.0loopy belief propagation · 0.0graphical model · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | DIVA: Dataset Derivative of a Learning Task
Yonatan Dukler, Alessandro Achille, Giovanni Paolini, Avinash Ravichandran, Marzia Polito, Stefano Soatto |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2021 | LQF: Linear Quadratic Fine-TuningabstractClassifiers that are linear in their parameters, and trained by optimizing a convex loss function, have predictable behavior with respect to changes in the training data, initial conditions, and optimization. Such desirable properties are absent in deep neural networks (DNNs), typically trained by non-linear fine-tuning of a pre-trained model. Previous attempts to linearize DNNs have led to interesting theoretical insights, but have not impacted the practice due to the substantial performance gap compared to standard non-linear optimization. We present the first method for linearizing a pre-trained model that achieves comparable performance to non-linear fine-tuning on most of real-world image classification tasks tested, thus enjoying the interpretability of linear models without incurring punishing losses in performance. LQF consists of simple modifications to the architecture, loss function and optimization typically used for classification: Leaky-ReLU instead of ReLU, mean squared loss instead of cross-entropy, and pre-conditioning using Kronecker factorization. None of these changes in isolation is sufficient to approach the performance of non-linear fine-tuning. When used in combination, they allow us to reach comparable performance, and even superior in the low-data regime, while enjoying the simplicity, robustness and interpretability of linear-quadratic optimization. Alessandro Achille, Aditya Golatkar, Avinash Ravichandran, Marzia Polito, Stefano Soatto |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2021 | Mixed-Privacy Forgetting in Deep NetworksabstractWe show that the influence of a subset of the training samples can be removed – or "forgotten" – from the weights of a network trained on large-scale image classification tasks, and we provide strong computable bounds on the amount of remaining information after forgetting. Inspired by real-world applications of forgetting techniques, we introduce a novel notion of forgetting in mixed-privacy setting, where we know that a "core" subset of the training samples does not need to be forgotten. While this variation of the problem is conceptually simple, we show that working in this setting significantly improves the accuracy and guarantees of forgetting methods applied to vision classification tasks. Moreover, our method allows efficient removal of all information contained in non-core data by simply setting to zero a subset of the weights with minimal loss in performance. We achieve these results by replacing a standard deep network with a suitable linear approximation. With opportune changes to the network architecture and training procedure, we show that such linear approximation achieves comparable performance to the original network and that the forgetting problem becomes quadratic and can be solved efficiently even for large models. Unlike previous forgetting methods on deep networks, ours can achieve close to the state-of-the-art accuracy on large scale vision tasks. In particular, we show that our method allows forgetting without having to trade off the model accuracy. Aditya Golatkar, Alessandro Achille, Avinash Ravichandran, Marzia Polito, Stefano Soatto |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2006 | Detecting phases in parallel applications on shared memory architecturesabstractMost programs are repetitive, where similar behavior can be seen at different execution times. Algorithms have been proposed that automatically group similar portions of a program's execution into phases, where samples of execution in the same phase have homogeneous behavior and similar resource requirements. In this paper, we examine applying these phase analysis algorithms and how to adapt them to parallel applications running on shared memory processors. Our approach relies on a separate representation of each thread's activity. We first focus on showing its ability to identify similar intervals of execution across threads for a single run. We then show that it is effective at identifying similar behavior of a program when the number of threads is varied between runs. This can be used by developers to examine how different phases scale across different number of threads. Finally, we examine using the phase analysis to pick simulation points to guide multithreaded simulation. Erez Perelman, Marzia Polito, Jean-Yves Bouguet, Jack Sampson, Brad Calder, Carole Dulong |
IPDPS | 2 |
| 2004 | The Fuzzy Correlation between Code and Performance PredictabilityabstractRecent studies have shown that most SPEC CPU2K benchmarks exhibit strong phase behavior, and the Cycles per Instruction (CPI) performance metric can be accurately predicted based on program's control-flow behavior, by simply observing the sequencing of the program counters, or extended instruction pointers (EIPs). One motivation of this paper is to see if server workloads also exhibit such phase behavior. In particular, can EIPs effectively predict CPI in server workloads? We propose using regression trees to measure the theoretical upper bound on the accuracy of predicting the CPI using EIPs, where accuracy is measure by the explained variance of CPI with EIPs. Our results show that for most server workloads and, surprisingly, even for CPU2K benchmarks, the accuracy of predicting CPI from EIPs varies widely. We classify the benchmarks into four quadrants based on their CPI variance and predictability of CPI using EIPs. Our results indicate that no single sampling technique can be broadly applied to a large class of applications. We propose a new methodology that selects the best-suited sampling technique to accurately capture the program behavior. Murali Annavaram, Ryan N. Rakvic, Marzia Polito, Jean-Yves Bouguet, Richard A. Hankins, Bob Davies |
MICRO | 3 |
| 2003 | An Improved Scheme for Detection and Labelling in Johansson DisplaysabstractConsider a number of moving points, where each point is attached to a joint of the human body and projected onto an image plane. Johannson showed that humans can effortlessly detect and recog- nize the presence of other humans from such displays. This is true even when some of the body points are missing (e.g. because of occlusion) and unrelated clutter points are added to the display. We are interested in replicating this ability in a machine. To this end, we present a labelling and detection scheme in a probabilistic framework. Our method is based on representing the joint prob- ability density of positions and velocities of body points with a graphical model, and using Loopy Belief Propagation to calculate a likely interpretation of the scene. Furthermore, we introduce a global variable representing the body’s centroid. Experiments on one motion-captured sequence suggest that our scheme improves on the accuracy of a previous approach based on triangulated graph- ical models, especially when very few parts are visible. The im- provement is due both to the more general graph structure we use and, more significantly, to the introduction of the centroid variable. Claudio Fanti, Marzia Polito, Pietro Perona |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2001 | Grouping and dimensionality reduction by locally linear embeddingabstract(LLE) Locally Linear Embedding is an elegant nonlinear dimensionality-reduction technique recently introduced by Roweis and Saul [2]. It fails when the data is divided into separate groups. We study a variant of LLE that can simultaneously group the data and calculate local embedding of each group. An estimate for the upper bound on the intrinsic dimension of the data set is obtained automatically. Marzia Polito, Pietro Perona |
NIPS | 1 |