Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yu Lou 0003

dblp:86/8699-3 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-1326-1771ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 30% Video understanding and tracking · 30% Vision and language · 30%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 86% Geometric modeling and processing · 14%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model
0.812024
ICAR: Image-Based Complementary Auto Reasoning · AAAI 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › cross-modal alignment › visual-semantic alignment
video-language alignment
0.812024
ViLA: Efficient Video-Language Alignment for Video Question Answering · ECCV (62) 2024
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video question answering
0.812024
ViLA: Efficient Video-Language Alignment for Video Question Answering · ECCV (62) 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
efficient multimodal learning
0.212024
ViLA: Efficient Video-Language Alignment for Video Question Answering · ECCV (62) 2024
Geometric modeling and processing
procedural modeling
0.112011
Metropolis procedural modeling · ACM Trans. Graph. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 1.5self-supervised learning · 1.5vision-language model · 0.8optimization over productions · 0.1metropolis sampling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 ICAR: Image-Based Complementary Auto Reasoning
abstract
Scene-aware Complementary Item Retrieval (CIR) is a challenging task which requires to generate a set of compatible items across domains. Due to the subjectivity, it is difficult to set up a rigorous standard for both data collection and learning objectives. To address this challenging task, we propose a visual compatibility concept, composed of similarity (resembling in color, geometry, texture, and etc.) and complementarity (different items like table vs chair completing a group). Based on this notion, we propose a compatibility learning framework, a category-aware Flexible Bidirectional Transformer (FBT), for visual ``scene-based set compatibility reasoning'' with the cross-domain visual similarity input and auto-regressive complementary item generation. We introduce a ``Flexible Bidirectional Transformer (FBT),'' consisting of an encoder with flexible masking, a category prediction arm, and an auto-regressive visual embedding prediction arm. And the inputs for FBT are cross-domain visual similarity invariant embeddings, making this framework quite generalizable. Furthermore, our proposed FBT model learns the inter-object compatibility from a large set of scene images in a self-supervised way. Compared with the SOTA methods, this approach achieves up to 5.3% and 9.6% in FITB score and 22.3% and 31.8% SFID improvement on fashion and furniture, respectively.
Xijun Wang 0002, Anqi Liang, Junbang Liang, Ming C. Lin, Yu Lou 0003
AAAI5
2024 ViLA: Efficient Video-Language Alignment for Video Question Answering
Xijun Wang 0002, Junbang Liang, Chun-Kai Wang, Kenan Deng 0001, Yu Lou 0003, Ming C. Lin
ECCV (62)5
2011 Metropolis procedural modeling
abstract
Procedural representations provide powerful means for generating complex geometric structures. They are also notoriously difficult to control. In this article, we present an algorithm for controlling grammar-based procedural models. Given a grammar and a high-level specification of the desired production, the algorithm computes a production from the grammar that conforms to the specification. This production is generated by optimizing over the space of possible productions from the grammar. The algorithm supports specifications of many forms, including geometric shapes and analytical objectives. We demonstrate the algorithm on procedural models of trees, cities, buildings, and Mondrian paintings.
Jerry O. Talton, Yu Lou 0003, Steve Lesser, Jared Duke, Radomír Mech, Vladlen Koltun
ACM Trans. Graph.2