Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Thomas P. Kehler

dblp:87/1232 · also Tom Kehler · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1983
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automata and formal languages · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 77% Interaction techniques and input · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Database system architecture and tuning · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge base		 0.011983
Industrial Strength Knowledge Bases: Issues and Experiences - Knowledge Base Stability, Memory: Unitorm or Structured, Integrity, Knowledge Acquisition and the User Interface, Joint Knowledge Base Development, Intertaces to Databases (Panel) · IJCAI 1983
User interface design and tools › interactive systems › help systems
online help systems		 0.011981
Interfacing to text using HELPME · CHI (2) 1981
Automata and formal languages › grammar formalisms
augmented transition network grammars		 0.011980
ATN Grammar Modeling in Applied Linguistics · ACL 1980
Automata and formal languages
grammar formalisms		 0.011980
ATN Grammar Modeling in Applied Linguistics · ACL 1980
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge acquisition		 0.011983
Industrial Strength Knowledge Bases: Issues and Experiences - Knowledge Base Stability, Memory: Unitorm or Structured, Integrity, Knowledge Acquisition and the User Interface, Joint Knowledge Base Development, Intertaces to Databases (Panel) · IJCAI 1983
Database system architecture and tuning
database interface		 0.011983
Industrial Strength Knowledge Bases: Issues and Experiences - Knowledge Base Stability, Memory: Unitorm or Structured, Integrity, Knowledge Acquisition and the User Interface, Joint Knowledge Base Development, Intertaces to Databases (Panel) · IJCAI 1983

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

grammar modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1983 Industrial Strength Knowledge Bases: Issues and Experiences - Knowledge Base Stability, Memory: Unitorm or Structured, Integrity, Knowledge Acquisition and the User Interface, Joint Knowledge Base Development, Intertaces to Databases (Panel)
Thomas P. Kehler, Peter Friedland, Harry E. Pople, René Reboh, Steve Rosenberg
 IJCAI1
1981 Interfacing to text using HELPME
Thomas P. Kehler, Mike Barnes
 CHI (2)1
1980 ATN Grammar Modeling in Applied Linguistics
abstract
Augmented Transition Network grammars have significant areas of unexplored application as a simulation tool for grammar designers. The intent of this paper is to discuss some current efforts in developing a grammar testing tool for the specialist in linguistics. The scope of the system under discussion is to display structures based on the modeled grammar. Full language definition with facilitation of semantic interpretation is not within the scope of the systems described in this paper. Application of grammar testing to an applied linguistics research enviroment is emphasized. Extensions to the teaching of linguistics principles and to refinement of the primitive ATN functions are also considered.
Thomas P. Kehler, R. C. Woods
 ACL1