Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tse-Chung Wei

dblp:87/6605 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers
Image and video processing · 74% Computational photography and imaging · 26%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › image restoration › image deblurring
defocused image recovery
0.021995
Focused image recovery from two defocused images recorded with different camera settings · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1995
Focused image recovery from two defocused images recorded with different camera settings · CVPR 1994
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation
0.021994
Focused image recovery from two defocused images recorded with different camera settings · CVPR 1994
Depth from defocus and rapid autofocusing: a practical approach · CVPR 1992
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation › focus-based depth estimation
depth from defocus
0.021994
Focused image recovery from two defocused images recorded with different camera settings · CVPR 1994
Depth from defocus and rapid autofocusing: a practical approach · CVPR 1992
Image and video processing › image restoration › image deblurring
blur parameter estimation
0.011995
Focused image recovery from two defocused images recorded with different camera settings · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1995
Computational photography and imaging › depth estimation
depth from defocus
0.011995
Focused image recovery from two defocused images recorded with different camera settings · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1995
Image and video processing › image restoration
image deblurring
0.011995
Focused image recovery from two defocused images recorded with different camera settings · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1995
Image and video processing
image restoration
0.011994
Focused image recovery from two defocused images recorded with different camera settings · CVPR 1994
Computational photography and imaging › image acquisition › imaging system design › camera design
autofocus
0.011992
Depth from defocus and rapid autofocusing: a practical approach · CVPR 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wiener filter · 0.0spatial domain convolution/deconvolution transform · 0.0one-dimensional fourier coefficients · 0.0point spread function calibration · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Focused image recovery from two defocused images recorded with different camera settings
abstract
Two new methods are presented for recovering the focused image of an object from only two blurred images recorded with different camera parameter settings.The camera parameters include lens position, focal length, and aperture diameter.First a blur parameter is estimated using one of our two recently proposed depth-fromdefocus methods.Then one of the two blurred images is deconvolved to recover the focused image.The first method is based on a recently proposed Spatial Domain Convolution/Deconvolution Transform.This method requires only the knowledge of of the camera's point spread function (PSF).It does not require information about the actual form of the camera's PSF.The second method, in contrast to the first, requires full knowledge of the form of the PSF.As part of the second method, we present a calibration procedure for estimating the camera's PSF for different values of the blur parameter .In the second method, the focused image is obtained through deconvolution in the Fourier Domain using the Wiener filter.For both methods, results of experiments on actual defocused images recorded by a CCD camera are given.The first method requires much less computation than the second method.The first method gives satisfactory results for up to medium levels of blur and the second method gives good results for up to relatively high levels of blur.
Murali Subbarao, Tse-Chung Wei, Gopal Surya
IEEE Trans. Image Process.2
1994 Focused image recovery from two defocused images recorded with different camera settings
abstract
Two new methods are presented for recovering the focused image of an object from only two blurred images recorded with different camera parameter settings. First a blur parameter /spl sigma/ is estimated using one of our two recently proposed depth-from-defocus methods. Then one of the two blurred images is deconvolved to recover the focused image. The first method requires only the knowledge of /spl sigma/ of the camera's point spread function (PSF). It is based on a new spatial domain convolution/deconvolution transform. The second method requires full knowledge of the form of the PSF and is estimated using step edges. The focused image is obtained through deconvolution in the Fourier Domain using the Wiener filter. For both methods, results of experiments on actual defocused images recorded by a CCD camera are presented. The first method requires less computation and gives satisfactory results for up to medium levels of blur. The second method gives good results for up to relatively high levels of blur.>
Murali Subbarao, Tse-Chung Wei, Gopal Surya
CVPR2
1992 Depth from defocus and rapid autofocusing: a practical approach
abstract
A method for determining depth (range) from image defocus and rapid autofocusing of a camera named DFD1F, is presented. It requires only two images in theory, but three images in the present implementation. DFD1F is based on computing only one-dimensional Fourier coefficients as opposed to two-dimensional Fourier coefficients for a related prior method, thus providing not only computational advantage but also robustness in practical applications. DFD1F is independent of the form of the modulation transfer function of the camera. DFD1F has been successfully implemented and tested on an actual camera system named SPARCS. SPARCS can determine the distance of an object placed in front of it at any distance in the range of 0.5 m to infinity, and can successfully focus the object by moving the lens with a root-mean-square error of less than 6% in terms of lens position.>
Murali Subbarao, Tse-Chung Wei
CVPR2