Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mohammad Karami

dblp:87/9567 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0003-1903-828XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 3 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
3 papers
Network security · 53% Systems and software security · 27% Web and mobile security · 20%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 60% Web and social media mining · 40%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network security › attack strategy › denial-of-service attack
DDoS attack
0.212016
Stress Testing the Booters: Understanding and Undermining the Business of DDoS Services · WWW 2016
Network security › attack resilience › attack mitigation › denial-of-service defense
DDoS defense
0.212016
Stress Testing the Booters: Understanding and Undermining the Business of DDoS Services · WWW 2016
Systems and software security › vulnerability management
vulnerability disclosure
0.212016
You've Got Vulnerability: Exploring Effective Vulnerability Notifications · USENIX Security Symposium 2016
Web and social media mining › online community analysis
underground forum analysis
0.112016
Stress Testing the Booters: Understanding and Undermining the Business of DDoS Services · WWW 2016
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.112016
You've Got Vulnerability: Exploring Effective Vulnerability Notifications · USENIX Security Symposium 2016
Information retrieval › search engines
search engine ranking
0.112014
Search + Seizure: The Effectiveness of Interventions on SEO Campaigns · Internet Measurement Conference 2014
Information retrieval › web search
search result manipulation
0.112014
Search + Seizure: The Effectiveness of Interventions on SEO Campaigns · Internet Measurement Conference 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

empirical measurement · 0.9user study · 0.5payment intervention · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Linking Amplification DDoS Attacks to Booter Services
Johannes Krupp, Mohammad Karami, Christian Rossow, Damon McCoy, Michael Backes 0001
RAID2
2016 Attribution of Economic Denial of Sustainability Attacks in Public Clouds
Mohammad Karami, Songqing Chen
SecureComm1
2016 You've Got Vulnerability: Exploring Effective Vulnerability Notifications
Frank Li 0001, Zakir Durumeric, Jakub Czyz, Mohammad Karami, Michael D. Bailey, Damon McCoy, Stefan Savage, Vern Paxson
USENIX Security Symposium4
2016 Stress Testing the Booters: Understanding and Undermining the Business of DDoS Services
abstract
DDoS-for-hire services, also known as booters, have commoditized DDoS attacks and enabled abusive subscribers of these services to cheaply extort, harass and intimidate businesses and people by taking them offline. However, due to the underground nature of these booters, little is known about their underlying technical and business structure. In this paper, we empirically measure many facets of their technical and payment infrastructure. We also perform an analysis of leaked and scraped data from three major booters---Asylum Stresser, Lizard Stresser and VDO---which provides us with an in-depth view of their customers and victims. Finally, we conduct a large-scale payment intervention in collaboration with PayPal and evaluate its effectiveness as a deterrent to their operations. Based on our analysis, we show that these booters are responsible for hundreds of thousands of DDoS attacks and identify potentially promising methods to undermine these services by increasing their costs of operation.
Mohammad Karami, Youngsam Park, Damon McCoy
WWW1
2014 Search + Seizure: The Effectiveness of Interventions on SEO Campaigns
abstract
Black hat search engine optimization (SEO), the practice of abusively manipulating search results, is an enticing method to acquire targeted user traffic. In turn, a range of interventions--from modifying search results to seizing domains--are used to combat this activity. In this paper, we examine the effectiveness of these interventions in the context of an understudied market niche, counterfeit luxury goods. Using eight months of empirical crawled data, we identify 52 distinct SEO campaigns, document how well they are able to place search results for sixteen luxury brands, how this capability impacts the dynamics of their order volumes and how well existing interventions undermine this business when employed.
David Y. Wang, Matthew F. Der, Mohammad Karami, Lawrence K. Saul, Damon McCoy, Stefan Savage, Geoffrey M. Voelker
Internet Measurement Conference3