Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stephan Busemann

dblp:88/1950 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
14ranked-venue papers
8as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-0332-9939ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 14 · 8 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 58% Language models and text generation · 19% Machine translation · 17%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
grammar-based parsing
0.011991
Using Pattern-Action Rules for the Generation of GPSG Structures from MT-Oriented Semantics · IJCAI 1991
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
yes/no question answering
0.011983
Over-Answering Yes-No Questions: Extended Responses in a NL Interface to a Vision System · IJCAI 1983

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic transfer · 0.0pattern-action rules · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Language Data Sharing in European Public Services - Overcoming Obstacles and Creating Sustainable Data Sharing Infrastructures
abstract
Data is key in training modern language technologies. In this paper, we summarise the findings of the first pan-European study on obstacles to sharing language data across 29 EU Member States and CEF-affiliated countries carried out under the ELRC White Paper action on Sustainable Language Data Sharing to Support Language Equality in Multilingual Europe. Why Language Data Matters. We present the methodology of the study, the obstacles identified and report on recommendations on how to overcome those. The obstacles are classified into (1) lack of appreciation of the value of language data, (2) structural challenges, (3) disposition towards CAT tools and lack of digital skills, (4) inadequate language data management practices, (5) limited access to outsourced translations, and (6) legal concerns. Recommendations are grouped into addressing the European/national policy level, and the organisational/institutional level.
Lilli Smal, Andrea Lösch, Josef van Genabith, Maria Giagkou, Thierry Declerck, Stephan Busemann
LREC6
2013 Towards Computational Models for a Long-term Interaction with an Artificial Conversational Companion
Sviatlana Danilava, Stephan Busemann, Christoph Schommer, Gudrun Ziegler
ICAART (1)2
2012 Artificial Conversational Companions - A Requirements Analysis
Sviatlana Danilava, Stephan Busemann, Christoph Schommer
ICAART (2)2
2008 Identifying Foreign Person Names in Chinese Text
Stephan Busemann
LREC1
2004 EGRAM - A Grammar Development Environment and its Usage for Language Generation
Stephan Busemann
LREC1
2004 Resources and Techniques for Multilingual Information Extraction
Stephan Busemann, Hans-Ulrich Krieger
LREC1
2002 Multilingual Summarization by Integrating Linguistic Resources in the MLIS-MUSI Project
Alessandro Lenci, Roberto Bartolini, Nicoletta Calzolari, Ana Agua, Stephan Busemann, Emmanuel Cartier, Karine Chevreau, José Coch
LREC5
1998 A Flexible Shallow Approach To Text Generation
Stephan Busemann, Helmut Horacek
INLG1
1996 Best-First Surface Realization
abstract
Current work in surface realization concentrates on the use of general, abstract algorithms that interpret large, reversible grammars.Only little attention has been paid so far to the many small and simple applications that require coverage of a small sublanguage at different degrees of sophistication.The system TG/2 described in this paper can be smoothly integrated with deep generation processes, it integrates canned text, templates, and context-free rules into a single formalism, it allows for both textual and tabular output, and it can be parameterized according to linguistic preferences.These features are based on suitably restricted production system techniques and on a generic backtracking regime. MotivationCurrent work in surface realization concentrates on the use of general, abstract algorithms that interpret declaratively defined, non-directional grammars.It is claimed that this way, a grammar can be reused for parsing *This work has been supported by a
Stephan Busemann
INLG (1)1
1994 DISCO-An HPSG-based NLP System and its Application for Appointment Scheduling Project Note
Hans Uszkoreit, Rolf Backofen, Stephan Busemann, Abdel Kader Diagne, Elizabeth A. Hinkelman, Walter Kasper, Bernd Kiefer, Hans-Ulrich Krieger, Klaus Netter, Günter Neumann, Stephan Oepen, Stephen P. Spackman
COLING3
1991 Structure-Driven Generation From Separate Semantic Representations
Stephan Busemann
EACL1
1991 Using Pattern-Action Rules for the Generation of GPSG Structures from MT-Oriented Semantics
Stephan Busemann
IJCAI1
1988 A constructive view of GPSG or how to make it work
Stephan Busemann, Christa Hauenschild
COLING1
1983 Over-Answering Yes-No Questions: Extended Responses in a NL Interface to a Vision System
Wolfgang Wahlster, Heinz Marburger, Anthony Jameson, Stephan Busemann
IJCAI4