Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Soussan Djamasbi

dblp:88/3368 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
5as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-8638-8402ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Accessibility and assistive technology · 46% Wearable and physiological sensing · 31% Usability and user experience research · 14%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Accessibility and assistive technology
assistive technology for visual impairment
0.212013
Factors that affect visually impaired users' acceptance of audio and music websites · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2013
Wearable and physiological sensing
eye tracking
0.112010
Generation Y, web design, and eye tracking · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2010
Usability and user experience research
technology acceptance
0.012013
Factors that affect visually impaired users' acceptance of audio and music websites · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2013
User interface design and tools
web site design
0.012010
Generation Y, web design, and eye tracking · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

eye tracking · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Applying Design Thinking to Develop a Mobile App for Patients with Suicide Risk
Bengisu Tulu, Soussan Djamasbi, Fatima Varzgani, Rocsoe Garner, Edwin D. Boudreaux, Celine Larkin
AMIA2
2022 Use of Eye-Tracking in Usability Evaluation of Digital Health Technologies: A Systematic Review of Literature
Fatima Varzgani, Soussan Djamasbi, Bengisu Tulu
AMIA2
2021 Use of Geomapping and Data-driven Personas to Target Intervention for At-risk Patients with Diabetes
Adarsha S. Bajracharya, Soussan Djamasbi, Gaayathri Sankar, Qiming Shi, Daniel J. Amante
AMIA2
2019 Detecting task demand via an eye tracking machine learning system
Mina Shojaeizadeh, Soussan Djamasbi, Randy C. Paffenroth, Andrew C. Trapp
Decis. Support Syst.2
2019 Identifying Fixations in Gaze Data via Inner Density and Optimization
abstract
Eye tracking is an increasingly common technology with a variety of practical uses. Eye-tracking data, or gaze data, can be categorized into two main events: fixations represent focused eye movement, indicative of awareness and attention, whereas saccades are higher-velocity movements that occur between fixation events. Common methods to identify fixations in gaze data can lack sensitivity to peripheral points and may misrepresent positional and durational properties of fixations. To address these shortcomings, we introduce the notion of inner density for fixation identification, which concerns both the duration of the fixation and the proximity of its constituent gaze points. Moreover, we demonstrate how to identify fixations in a sequence of gaze data by optimizing for inner density. After decomposing the clustering of a temporal gaze data sequence into successive regions (chunks), we use nonlinear and linear 0–1 optimization formulations to identify the densest fixations within a given data chunk. Our approach is parametrized by a unique constant that adjusts the degree of desired density, allowing decision makers to have fine-tuned control over density during the process. Computational experiments on real data sets demonstrate the efficiency of our approach and its effectiveness in identifying fixations with greater density than existing methods, thereby enabling the refinement of key gaze metrics such as fixation duration and fixation center.
Andrew C. Trapp, Soussan Djamasbi
INFORMS J. Comput.3
2017 Information systems and task demand: An exploratory pupillometry study of computerized decision making
Dennis D. Fehrenbacher, Soussan Djamasbi
Decis. Support Syst.2
2013 Factors that affect visually impaired users' acceptance of audio and music websites
Eleanor T. Loiacono, Soussan Djamasbi, Todor Kiryazov
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.2
2010 Affect and acceptance: Examining the effects of positive mood on the technology acceptance model
Soussan Djamasbi, Diane M. Strong, Mark T. Dishaw
Decis. Support Syst.1
2010 Generation Y, web design, and eye tracking
Soussan Djamasbi, Marisa Siegel, Thomas S. Tullis
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.1
2008 Do men and women use feedback provided by their Decision Support Systems (DSS) differently
Soussan Djamasbi, Eleanor T. Loiacono
Decis. Support Syst.1
2008 The effect of positive mood on intention to use computerized decision aids
Soussan Djamasbi, Diane M. Strong
Inf. Manag.1
2007 Does positive affect influence the effective usage of a Decision Support System?
Soussan Djamasbi
Decis. Support Syst.1