Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christopher W. Geib

dblp:88/4021 · also Christopher William Geib · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 7 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 9 · 6 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
9 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 90% Information extraction and text analysis · 8% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 1%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Automata and formal languages · 89% Computational complexity · 11%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Accessibility and assistive technology · 77% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 23%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
plan recognition
0.872018
Learning Combinatory Categorial Grammars for Plan Recognition · AAAI 2018
Recognizing Plans with Loops Represented in a Lexicalized Grammar · AAAI 2011
A probabilistic plan recognition algorithm based on plan tree grammars · Artif. Intell. 2009
Automata and formal languages
grammatical inference
0.312018
Learning Combinatory Categorial Grammars for Plan Recognition · AAAI 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › nondeterministic planning
planning with loops
0.112011
Recognizing Plans with Loops Represented in a Lexicalized Grammar · AAAI 2011
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › plan recognition
probabilistic plan recognition
0.112009
A probabilistic plan recognition algorithm based on plan tree grammars · Artif. Intell. 2009
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.112009
Delaying Commitment in Plan Recognition Using Combinatory Categorial Grammars · IJCAI 2009
Accessibility and assistive technology
assistive technology
0.012004
The Independent LifeStyle AssistantTM (I.L.S.A.): AI Lessons Learned · AAAI 2004
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
goal reasoning
0.012003
Recognizing Plan/Goal Abandonment · IJCAI 2003
Automata and formal languages › parsing
context-free grammar parsing
0.012011
Recognizing Plans with Loops Represented in a Lexicalized Grammar · AAAI 2011
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › goal reasoning
goal decomposition
0.011997
Prioritized Goal Decomposition of Markov Decision Processes: Toward a Synthesis of Classical and Decision Theoretic Planning · IJCAI 1997
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty › probabilistic planning
markov decision process planning
0.011997
Prioritized Goal Decomposition of Markov Decision Processes: Toward a Synthesis of Classical and Decision Theoretic Planning · IJCAI 1997
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
smart home
0.012004
The Independent LifeStyle AssistantTM (I.L.S.A.): AI Lessons Learned · AAAI 2004
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › instruction following
natural language instruction understanding
0.011995
Instructions, Intentions and Expectations · Artif. Intell. 1995
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
reasoning about action and change
0.011995
Instructions, Intentions and Expectations · Artif. Intell. 1995
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
classical planning
0.011997
Prioritized Goal Decomposition of Markov Decision Processes: Toward a Synthesis of Classical and Decision Theoretic Planning · IJCAI 1997
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
agent behavior
0.011995
Instructions, Intentions and Expectations · Artif. Intell. 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

grammar induction · 0.7ε-production elimination · 0.2left-recursion removal · 0.2grammar rewriting · 0.2probabilistic parsing · 0.1plan tree grammars · 0.1combinatory categorial grammar · 0.1hierarchical planning · 0.0decision theory · 0.0human figure animation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Scaling up CCG-Based Plan Recognition via Monte-Carlo Tree Search
abstract
This paper focuses on the problem of scaling Combinatory Categorial Grammar (CCG)-based plan recognition to large CCG representations in the context of Real-Time Strategy (RTS) games. Specifically, we present a technique to scale plan recognition to large domain representations using Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS). CCG-based planning and plan recognition (like other domain-configurable planning frameworks) require domain definitions to be either manually authored or learned from data. Prior work has demonstrated successful learning of these CCG domain definitions from data, but these representations can be very large for complex application domains. We propose a MCTS-based approach to search for explanations and predict the goal of a given sequence of observed actions. We evaluate our approach on the RTS game AI testbed microRTS. Our experimental results show our method scales better to these large, learned CCGs than previous CCG-based approaches.
Pavan Kantharaju, Santiago Ontañón, Christopher W. Geib
CoG3
2018 Learning Combinatory Categorial Grammars for Plan Recognition
abstract
This paper defines a learning algorithm for plan grammars used for plan recognition. The algorithm learns Combinatory Categorial Grammars (CCGs) that capture the structure of plans from a set of successful plan execution traces paired with the goal of the actions. This work is motivated by past work on CCG learning algorithms for natural language processing, and is evaluated on five well know planning domains.
Christopher W. Geib, Pavan Kantharaju
AAAI1
2011 Recognizing Plans with Loops Represented in a Lexicalized Grammar
abstract
This paper extends existing plan recognition research to handle plans containing loops. We supply an encoding of plans with loops for recognition, based on techniques used to parse lexicalized grammars, and demonstrate its effectiveness empirically. To do this, the paper first shows how encoding plan libraries as context free grammars permits the application of standard rewriting techniques to remove left recursion and ε-productions, thereby enabling polynomial time parsing. However, these techniques alone fail to provide efficient algorithms for plan recognition. We show how the loop-handling methods from formal grammars can be extended to the more general plan recognition problem and provide a method for encoding loops in an existing plan recognition system that scales linearly in the number of loop iterations.
Christopher W. Geib, Robert P. Goldman
AAAI1
2009 Delaying Commitment in Plan Recognition Using Combinatory Categorial Grammars
Christopher W. Geib
IJCAI1
2009 A probabilistic plan recognition algorithm based on plan tree grammars
Christopher W. Geib, Robert P. Goldman
Artif. Intell.1
2007 On Natural Language Processing and Plan Recognition
Christopher W. Geib, Mark Steedman
IJCAI1
2004 Assessing the Complexity of Plan Recognition
Christopher W. Geib
AAAI1
2004 The Independent LifeStyle AssistantTM (I.L.S.A.): AI Lessons Learned
Karen Zita Haigh, Liana M. Kiff, Janet Myers, Valerie Guralnik, Christopher W. Geib, John Phelps, Thomas Wagner 0001
AAAI5
2003 Recognizing Plan/Goal Abandonment
Christopher W. Geib, Robert P. Goldman
IJCAI1
1999 A New Model of Plan Recognition
Robert P. Goldman, Christopher W. Geib, Christopher A. Miller 0001
UAI2
1998 Structured Reachability Analysis for Markov Decision Processes
Craig Boutilier, Ronen I. Brafman, Christopher W. Geib
UAI3
1997 Prioritized Goal Decomposition of Markov Decision Processes: Toward a Synthesis of Classical and Decision Theoretic Planning
Craig Boutilier, Ronen I. Brafman, Christopher W. Geib
IJCAI3
1995 Instructions, Intentions and Expectations
abstract
Based on an ongoing attempt to integrate Natural Language instructions with human figure animation, we demonstrate that agents' understanding and use of instructions can complement what they can derive from the environment in which they act. We focus on two attitudes that contribute to agents' behavior—their intentions and their expectations—and shown how Natural Language instructions contribute to such attitudes in ways that complement the environment. We also show that instructions can require more than one context of interpretation and thus that agents' understanding of instructions can evolve as their activity progresses. A significant consequence is that Natural Language understanding in the context of behavior cannot simply be treated as “front end” processing, but rather must be integrated more deeply into the processes that guide an agent's behavior and respond to its perceptions.
Bonnie L. Webber, Norman I. Badler, Barbara Di Eugenio, Christopher W. Geib, Libby Levison, Michael B. Moore
Artif. Intell.4