Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Earl C. Van Horn
dblp:88/5262
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1978
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Programming languages and type systems › language implementation
abstract machines |
0.0 | 1 | 1967 | Three criteria for designing computing systems to facilitate debugging · SOSP 1967 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
design criteria · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1978 | Software evolution using the SEER data baseabstractSoftware quality improvement and cost reduction are the results expected from better communication among the people who work on a software system. SEER supports communication about a target system during the target's entire life cycle, beginning in the early stages of design, by providing access to a data base of information about the target. SEER is based on the observation that software evolution, i.e., the modification of inservice software, is becoming the dominant aspect of software engineering. SEER does not yet exist, but its functions are being defined and evaluated with the aid of a "software breadboard". An extended example of SEER use is presented, together with a description of the user's view of the SEER data base and a summary of some advanced functions possible within the SEER framework. Earl C. Van Horn |
COMPSAC | 1 |
| 1967 | Three criteria for designing computing systems to facilitate debuggingabstractThe designer of a computing system should adopt explicit criteria for accepting or rejecting proposed system features. Three possible criteria of this kind are input recordability, input specifiability, and asychronous reproducibility of output. These criteria imply that a user can, if he desires, either know or control all of the influences affecting the content and extent of his computer's output. To define the scope of the criteria, the notion of an abstract machine of a programming language and the notion of a virtual computer are explained. Examples of applications of the criteria concern the reading of a time-of-day clock, the assignment of capability indices, and memory reading protection in multiprogrammed systems. Earl C. Van Horn |
SOSP | 1 |