Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Paul Michelman
dblp:88/6154
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Robot manipulation · 88% Motion planning and robot control · 7% Autonomous driving · 6% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation
dexterous manipulation |
0.0 | 3 | 1998 | Precision object manipulation with a multifingered robot hand · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1998 Forming Complex Dextrous Manipulations from Task Primitives · ICRA 1994 An integrated system for dextrous manipulation · ICRA 1989 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping
grasp planning |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Precision object manipulation with a multifingered robot hand · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1998 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping
multifingered grasping |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Precision object manipulation with a multifingered robot hand · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1998 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › dexterous manipulation
precision manipulation |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Precision object manipulation with a multifingered robot hand · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1998 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping |
0.0 | 2 | 1992 | Trajectory filtering and prediction for automated tracking and grasping of a moving object · ICRA 1992 An integrated system for dextrous manipulation · ICRA 1989 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping › grasp control
dynamic grasping |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Trajectory filtering and prediction for automated tracking and grasping of a moving object · ICRA 1992 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Trajectory filtering and prediction for automated tracking and grasping of a moving object · ICRA 1992 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
trajectory prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Trajectory filtering and prediction for automated tracking and grasping of a moving object · ICRA 1992 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › sensor-based control
visual servoing |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Trajectory filtering and prediction for automated tracking and grasping of a moving object · ICRA 1992 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
tactile sensing |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | An integrated system for dextrous manipulation · ICRA 1989 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
workspace analysis · 0.0force/position control partitioning · 0.0hybrid position/force control · 0.0finite state machine · 0.0trajectory filtering · 0.0real-time vision tracking · 0.0kinematic transformation · 0.0tendon force feedback · 0.0tactile array feedback · 0.0joint position feedback · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | Precision object manipulation with a multifingered robot handabstractThis paper outlines several key issues associated with precision manipulation for robot hands. Precision manipulation is defined as the control of a grasped object using fingertip contacts alone. A set of primitive manipulation functions is defined. They are generalizable in the sense that they take parameters for different object geometry, speed, and direction of motion. A single manipulation can be performed with a number of different grasp topologies. With each manipulation there are several associated computations: 1) the trajectories of the contact points can be calculated a priori from knowledge of the desired object motion; 2) a workspace analysis is performed to determine that the manipulation is within the workspaces of all of the fingers simultaneously; and 3) task partitioning is performed to specify force- and position-controlled directions of the contact points. This partitioning controls the grasping forces on the object during the grasping and manipulation phases. The paper also describes how the primitive manipulations can be combined into complex tasks. The complex example of removing a top from a childproof bottle is presented. The manipulations were implemented on a Utah/MIT dextrous robot-hand system. Paul Michelman |
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. | 1 |
| 1994 | Forming Complex Dextrous Manipulations from Task PrimitivesabstractThis paper discusses the implementation of complex manipulation tasks with a dextrous hand. The approach used is to build a set of primitive manipulation functions and combine them to form complex tasks. Only fingertip, or precision, manipulations are considered. Each function performs a simple two-dimensional translation or rotation that can be generalized to work with objects of different sizes and using different grasping forces. Complex tasks are sequential combinations of the primitive functions. They are formed by analyzing the workspaces of the individual tasks and controlled by finite state machines. We present a number of examples, including a complex manipulation removing the top of a child-proof medicine bottle-that incorporates different hybrid position/force specifications of the primitive functions of which it is composed. The work has been implemented with a robot hand system using a Utah-MIT hand.> Paul Michelman, Peter K. Allen |
ICRA | 1 |
| 1994 | Shared autonomy in a robot hand teleoperation systemabstractThis paper considers adding autonomy to robot hands used in teleoperation systems. Currently, the finger positions of robot hands in teleoperation systems are controlled via a robot master using a Dataglove or exoskeleton. There are several difficulties with this approach: accurate calibration is hard to achieve; robot hands have different capabilities from human hands; and complex force reflection is difficult. In this paper we propose a model of hand teleoperation in which the input device commands the motions of a grasped object rather than the joint displacements of the fingers. To achieve this goal, the hand requires greater autonomy and the capability to perform high-level functions with minimal external input. Therefore, a set of general, primitive manipulation functions that can be performed automatically is defined. These elementary functions control simple rotations and translations of the grasped objects. They are incorporated into a teleoperation system by using a simple input device as a control signal. Preliminary implementations with a Utah/MIT are discussed.> Paul Michelman, Peter K. Allen |
IROS | 1 |
| 1993 | Automated tracking and grasping of a moving object with a robotic hand-eye systemabstractAn attempt to achieve a high level of interaction between a real-time vision system capable of tracking moving objects in 3-D and a robot arm with gripper that can be used to pick up a moving object is described. The interplay of hand-eye coordination in dynamic grasping tasks such as grasping of parts on a moving conveyor system, assembly of articulated parts, or for grasping from a mobile robotic system is explored. The goal is to build an integrated sensing and actuation system that can operate in dynamic as opposed to static environments. The system built addresses three distinct problems in using robotic hand-eye coordination for grasping moving objects: fast computation of 3-D motion parameters from vision, predictive control of a moving robotic arm to track a moving object, and interception and grasping. The system operates at approximately human arm movement rates. Experimental results in which a moving model train is tracked, stably grasped, and picked up by the system are presented. The algorithms developed to relate sensing to actuation are quite general and applicable to a variety of complex robotic tasks.> Peter K. Allen, Aleksandar Timcenko, Billibon H. Yoshimi, Paul Michelman |
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. | 4 |
| 1992 | Trajectory filtering and prediction for automated tracking and grasping of a moving objectabstractThe authors explore the requirements for grasping a moving object. This task requires proper coordination between at least three separate subsystems: real-time vision sensing, trajectory-planning/arm-control, and grasp planning. As with humans, the system first visually tracks the object's 3D position. Because the object is in motion, this must be done in real-time to coordinate the motion of the robotic arm as it tracks the object. The vision system is used to feed an arm control algorithm that plans a trajectory. The arm control algorithm is implemented into two steps: filtering and prediction and kinematic transformation computation. Once the trajectory of the object is tracked, the hand must intercept the object to actually grasp it. Experimental results are presented in which which a moving model train was tracked, stably grasped, and picked up by the system.> Peter K. Allen, Aleksandar Timcenko, Billibon H. Yoshimi, Paul Michelman |
ICRA | 4 |
| 1990 | Acquisition and interpretation of 3-D sensor data from touchabstractThe use of touch sensing as part of a large system being built for 3D shape recovery and object recognition using touch and vision methods is described. The authors focus on three exploratory procedures they have devised to acquire and interpret sparse 3D touch data: grasping by containment, planar surface exploration, and surface contour exploration. Experimental results for each of these procedures are presented.> Peter K. Allen, Paul Michelman |
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. | 2 |
| 1990 | A system for programming and controlling a multisensor robotic handabstractA system for programming and controlling a multisensor robotic hand (Utah-MIT Hand) is described. Using this system, a number of autonomous tasks that are easily programmed and include combinations of hand-arm actuation with force, position, and tactile sensing have been implemented. The system is controlled at the software level by a programming language DIAL that provides an easy method for expressing the parallel operation of robotic devices. It also provides a convenient way to implement task-level scripts that can then be bound to particular sensors, actuators, and methods for accomplishing a generic grasping or manipulation task. Experiments using the system to pick up and pour from a pitcher, unscrew a lightbulb, and explore planar surfaces are presented.> Peter K. Allen, Paul Michelman, Kenneth S. Roberts |
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. | 2 |
| 1989 | An integrated system for dextrous manipulationabstractThe authors describe an integrated system for dextrous manipulation using a Utah-MIT hand that makes it possible to look at the higher levels of control in a number of grasping and manipulation tasks. The system consists of a number of low-level system primitives for integrated hand and robotic arm movement, tactile sensors mounted on the fingertips, sensing primitives to utilize joint position, tendon force and tactile array feedback, and a high-level programming environment that allows task level scripts to be created for grasping and manipulation tasks are described that have been implemented with this system.> Peter K. Allen, Paul Michelman, Kenneth S. Roberts |
ICRA | 2 |