Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tianyi Zhou 0011
dblp:88/8205-11
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5348-0632ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 6 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 39% Deep learning architectures and training · 34% Representation and self-supervised learning · 20% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 61% Mathematical optimization · 30% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 9% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | Transformers Learn Low Sensitivity Functions: Investigations and Implications · ICLR 2025 Pre-trained Large Language Models Use Fourier Features to Compute Addition · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Faster Algorithms for Structured John Ellipsoid Computation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › randomized numerical linear algebra
input-sparsity time algorithms |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Faster Algorithms for Structured John Ellipsoid Computation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Algorithms and data structures
sketching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Faster Algorithms for Structured John Ellipsoid Computation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › feature transformation
fourier features |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Pre-trained Large Language Models Use Fourier Features to Compute Addition · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Pre-trained Large Language Models Use Fourier Features to Compute Addition · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › mathematical reasoning
numerical reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Pre-trained Large Language Models Use Fourier Features to Compute Addition · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Transformers Learn Low Sensitivity Functions: Investigations and Implications · ICLR 2025 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory › graph parameters › graph width parameters
treewidth |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Faster Algorithms for Structured John Ellipsoid Computation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Pre-trained Large Language Models Use Fourier Features to Compute Addition · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
treewidth-based algorithm · 0.9spectral bias analysis · 0.9sketching · 0.9NTK analysis · 0.9modular addition · 0.8mechanistic interpretability · 0.8fourier analysis · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Fourier Circuits in Neural Networks and Transformers: A Case Study of Modular Arithmetic with Multiple InputsabstractIn the evolving landscape of machine learning, a pivotal challenge lies in deciphering the internal representations harnessed by neural networks and Transformers. Building on recent progress toward comprehending how networks execute distinct target functions, our study embarks on an exploration of the underlying reasons behind networks adopting specific computational strategies. We direct our focus to the complex algebraic learning task of modular addition involving $k$ inputs. Our research presents a thorough analytical characterization of the features learned by stylized one-hidden layer neural networks and one-layer Transformers in addressing this task. A cornerstone of our theoretical framework is the elucidation of how the principle of margin maximization shapes the features adopted by one-hidden layer neural networks. Let $p$ denote the modulus, $D_p$ denote the dataset of modular arithmetic with $k$ inputs and $m$ denote the network width. We demonstrate that a neuron count of $ m \geq 2^{2k-2} \cdot (p-1) $, these networks attain a maximum $ L_{2,k+1} $-margin on the dataset $ D_p $. Furthermore, we establish that each hidden-layer neuron aligns with a specific Fourier spectrum, integral to solving modular addition problems. By correlating our findings with the empirical observations of similar studies, we contribute to a deeper comprehension of the intrinsic computational mechanisms of neural networks. Furthermore, we observe similar computational mechanisms in attention matrices of one-layer Transformers. Our work stands as a significant stride in unraveling their operation complexities, particularly in the realm of complex algebraic tasks. Yingyu Liang, Zhenmei Shi, Zhao Song 0002, Tianyi Zhou 0011 |
AISTATS | 5 |
| 2025 | Transformers Learn Low Sensitivity Functions: Investigations and ImplicationsabstractTransformers achieve state-of-the-art accuracy and robustness across many tasks, but an understanding of their inductive biases and how those biases differ from other neural network architectures remains elusive. In this work, we identify the sensitivity of the model to token-wise random perturbations in the input as a unified metric which explains the inductive bias of transformers across different data modalities and distinguishes them from other architectures. We show that transformers have lower sensitivity than MLPs, CNNs, ConvMixers and LSTMs, across both vision and language tasks. We also show that this low-sensitivity bias has important implications: i) lower sensitivity correlates with improved robustness; it can also be used as an efficient intervention to further improve the robustness of transformers; ii) it corresponds to flatter minima in the loss landscape; and iii) it can serve as a progress measure for grokking. We support these findings with theoretical results showing (weak) spectral bias of transformers in the NTK regime, and improved robustness due to the lower sensitivity. Bhavya Vasudeva, Deqing Fu, Tianyi Zhou 0011, Elliott Kau, Youqi Huang, Vatsal Sharan |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2025 | Faster Algorithms for Structured John Ellipsoid ComputationabstractThe famous theorem of Fritz John states that any convex body has a unique maximal volume inscribed ellipsoid, known as the John Ellipsoid. Computing the John Ellipsoid is a fundamental problem in convex optimization. In this paper, we focus on approximating the John Ellipsoid inscribed in a convex and centrally symmetric polytope defined by $P := \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^d : -\mathbf{1}_n \leq A x \leq \mathbf{1}_n \},$ where $ A \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$ is a rank-$d$ matrix and $ \mathbf{1}_n \in \mathbb{R}^n $ is the all-ones vector. We develop two efficient algorithms for approximating the John Ellipsoid. The first is a sketching-based algorithm that runs in nearly input-sparsity time $ \widetilde{O}(\mathrm{nnz}(A) + d^\omega) $, where $ \mathrm{nnz}(A) $ denotes the number of nonzero entries in the matrix $A$ and $ \omega \approx 2.37$ is the current matrix multiplication exponent. The second is a treewidth-based algorithm that runs in time $ \widetilde{O}(n \tau^2)$, where $\tau$ is the treewidth of the dual graph of the matrix $A$. Our algorithms significantly improve upon the state-of-the-art running time of $ \widetilde{O}(n d^2) $ achieved by [Cohen, Cousins, Lee, and Yang, COLT 2019]. Yang Cao 0020, Xiaoyu Li 0001, Zhao Song 0002, Xin Yang 0017, Tianyi Zhou 0011 |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2024 | Fast Second-order Method for Neural Networks under Small Treewidth SettingabstractTraining neural networks is a fundamental problem in theoretical machine learning. Second-order methods are rarely used in practice due to their high computational cost, even they converge much faster than first-order methods. The state-of-the-art result for the second-order method to train an over-parameterized neural network can run in O(log(1/ϵ)) iterations and each iteration has O(mnd + n3) running time, where n represent the number of data points, d is the dimension of the feature space of each data and m is the width of the neural network [Brand, Peng, Song and Weinstein ITCS 2021]. In this work, we further improve the convergence rate and the running time for each iteration to O(loglog(1/ϵ)) and O(mdτ2) respectively, where m = Ω(n4) and τ is the treewidth of the data matrix and usually very small. Our algorithm has a quadratic convergence rate, so it can be regarded as a truly second-order algorithm. To the best of our knowledge, our algorithm is the first to achieve a quadratic convergence rate for neural network training, with a per-iteration running time of O(mdτ2). Xiaoyu Li 0001, Jiangxuan Long 0001, Zhao Song 0002, Tianyi Zhou 0011 |
IEEE Big Data | 4 |
| 2024 | Faster Sampling Algorithms for Polytopes with Small TreewidthabstractSampling is a fundamental problem in optimization, machine learning and theoretical computer science. A common region of interest for sampling is the polytope, which is defined by a set of linear inequalities. The algorithm that is sampling from polytopes usually requires heavy matrix algebra, including matrix multiplication, matrix inversion and matrix determinant. In this work, we show how to implement the heavy matrix algebra in the area of sampling in nearly linear time for the polytope that has small treewidth. In particular, given a polytope defined by a matrix A ∈ ℝn×dwith treewidth τ, we improve the running time of each iteration for three typical sampling algorithms for polytopes such as Dikin Walk, Soft-Threshold Dikin Walk and Vaidya Walk from O(nd2) to O(nτ2) by exploiting the small treewidth structures of the matrices. Yekun Ke, Xiaoyu Li 0001, Zhao Song 0002, Tianyi Zhou 0011 |
IEEE Big Data | 4 |
| 2024 | Pre-trained Large Language Models Use Fourier Features to Compute AdditionabstractPre-trained large language models (LLMs) exhibit impressive mathematical reasoning capabilities, yet how they compute basic arithmetic, such as addition, remains unclear.
This paper shows that pre-trained LLMs add numbers using Fourier features---dimensions in the hidden state that represent numbers via a set of features sparse in the frequency domain.
Within the model, MLP and attention layers use Fourier features in complementary ways: MLP layers primarily approximate the magnitude of the answer using low-frequency features, while attention layers primarily perform modular addition (e.g., computing whether the answer is even or odd) using high-frequency features.
Pre-training is crucial for this mechanism: models trained from scratch to add numbers only exploit low-frequency features, leading to lower accuracy.
Introducing pre-trained token embeddings to a randomly initialized model rescues its performance.
Overall, our analysis demonstrates that appropriate pre-trained representations (e.g., Fourier features) can unlock the ability of Transformers to learn precise mechanisms for algorithmic tasks. Tianyi Zhou 0011, Deqing Fu, Vatsal Sharan, Robin Jia |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2014 | Geometry based visualization of hierarchical structuresabstractHierarchical structures are a common organization of data in the real world. In this paper, we propose a new type of tree structures called diamond tree to present the organization and relationship of hierarchical data. We design a spatial layout using the geometric theory, starting with a simple design and continually improving until the design that makes the best use of the screen estate. Finally, we use the diamond tree method to analyze the structure of Tianjin University website (www.tju.edu.cn). Kang Zhang 0001, Tianyi Zhou 0011, Dongwei Gong |
ICIS | 4 |