Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yair Wiener

dblp:88/9365 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 43% Efficient and distributed learning · 38% Learning theory · 10%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
selective classification
0.432012
Active Learning via Perfect Selective Classification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2012
Agnostic Selective Classification · NIPS 2011
On the Foundations of Noise-free Selective Classification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.422015
A compression technique for analyzing disagreement-based active learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2015
Active Learning via Perfect Selective Classification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2012
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.322012
Pointwise Tracking the Optimal Regression Function · NIPS 2012
Agnostic Selective Classification · NIPS 2011
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning
disagreement-based active learning
0.212015
A compression technique for analyzing disagreement-based active learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › bayesian decision theory
reject option
0.112012
Pointwise Tracking the Optimal Regression Function · NIPS 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

compression · 0.2linear regression · 0.1least squares regression · 0.1disagreement coefficient · 0.1constrained SVM · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Agnostic Pointwise-Competitive Selective Classification
abstract
Pointwise-competitive classifier from class F is required to classify identically to the best classifier in hindsight from F. For noisy, agnostic settings we present a strategy for learning pointwise-competitive classifiers from a finite training sample provided that the classifier can abstain from prediction at a certain region of its choice. For some interesting hypothesis classes and families of distributions, the measure of this rejected region is shown to be diminishing at a fast rate, with high probability. Exact implementation of the proposed learning strategy is dependent on an ERM oracle that can be hard to compute in the agnostic case. We thus consider a heuristic approximation procedure that is based on SVMs, and show empirically that this algorithm consistently outperforms a traditional rejection mechanism based on distance from decision boundary.
Yair Wiener, Ran El-Yaniv
J. Artif. Intell. Res.1
2015 A compression technique for analyzing disagreement-based active learning
Yair Wiener, Steve Hanneke, Ran El-Yaniv
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2012 Pointwise Tracking the Optimal Regression Function
abstract
This paper examines the possibility of a `reject option' in the context of least squares regression. It is shown that using rejection it is theoretically possible to learn `selective' regressors that can $\epsilon$-pointwise track the best regressor in hindsight from the same hypothesis class, while rejecting only a bounded portion of the domain. Moreover, the rejected volume vanishes with the training set size, under certain conditions. We then develop efficient and exact implementation of these selective regressors for the case of linear regression. Empirical evaluation over a suite of real-world datasets corroborates the theoretical analysis and indicates that our selective regressors can provide substantial advantage by reducing estimation error.
Yair Wiener, Ran El-Yaniv
NIPS1
2012 Active Learning via Perfect Selective Classification
Ran El-Yaniv, Yair Wiener
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2011 Agnostic Selective Classification
abstract
For a learning problem whose associated excess loss class is $(\beta,B)$-Bernstein, we show that it is theoretically possible to track the same classification performance of the best (unknown) hypothesis in our class, provided that we are free to abstain from prediction in some region of our choice. The (probabilistic) volume of this rejected region of the domain is shown to be diminishing at rate $O(B\theta (\sqrt{1/m}))^\beta)$, where $\theta$ is Hanneke's disagreement coefficient. The strategy achieving this performance has computational barriers because it requires empirical error minimization in an agnostic setting. Nevertheless, we heuristically approximate this strategy and develop a novel selective classification algorithm using constrained SVMs. We show empirically that the resulting algorithm consistently outperforms the traditional rejection mechanism based on distance from decision boundary.
Yair Wiener, Ran El-Yaniv
NIPS1
2010 On the Foundations of Noise-free Selective Classification
Ran El-Yaniv, Yair Wiener
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2002 A bucket-interleaving multiplexer for efficient near-on-demand streaming to resource-constrained clients
abstract
Bandwidth-optimal open-loop near-video-on-demand streaming (NVOD) entails the optimal assignment of transmission rates to a large number of program segments. These are transmitted concurrently and repetitively at their assigned rates. At any given time in its viewing of the program, a client must record data belonging to a contiguous subsequence of the segments for subsequent display. Limited client recording rates and storage capacity affect the rate assignments. In practice, the concurrent streams must be time-multiplexed onto a single channel, and efficient operation of the client disk drive used to store received data until its viewing prevents fine-grain multiplexing. The bucket-interleaving multiplexing scheme presented in this paper guarantees that each segment is repeated in its entirety within any contiguous time interval of the appropriate length, and reduces the required client "rate-smoothing" RAM buffer by two orders of magnitude relative to pure earliest-deadline-first multiplexing.
Yitzhak Birk, Yair Wiener
ICME (1)2