Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Emily Hartley

dblp:89/10575 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-5839-2535ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Segmentation and scene understanding · 36% 3D vision · 26% Vision and language · 21%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding
0.322013
Understanding Bayesian Rooms Using Composite 3D Object Models · CVPR 2013
Bayesian geometric modeling of indoor scenes · CVPR 2012
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › scene understanding
indoor scene understanding
0.322013
Understanding Bayesian Rooms Using Composite 3D Object Models · CVPR 2013
Bayesian geometric modeling of indoor scenes · CVPR 2012
Computer vision › Vision and language › cross-modal alignment
image-text alignment
0.112011
Fusing object detection and region appearance for image-text alignment · ACM Multimedia 2011
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.112011
Fusing object detection and region appearance for image-text alignment · ACM Multimedia 2011
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › region analysis
region labeling
0.112011
Fusing object detection and region appearance for image-text alignment · ACM Multimedia 2011
Computer vision › Vision and language › cross-modal alignment › image-text alignment
region-word alignment
0.112011
Fusing object detection and region appearance for image-text alignment · ACM Multimedia 2011
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition
0.012013
Understanding Bayesian Rooms Using Composite 3D Object Models · CVPR 2013
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
probabilistic generative model
0.012012
Bayesian geometric modeling of indoor scenes · CVPR 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bayesian generative model · 0.3data-driven inference · 0.2composite 3d object models · 0.2MCMC sampling · 0.1object classifier · 0.1appearance features · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Leveraging Biolink for Interoperability between Semantic Models
Ian Braun, Pablo Alarcón Moreno, Emily Hartley, Daniel Olson, Nirupama Benis, Ronald Cornet, Mark D. Wilkinson, Ramona L. Walls
AMIA3
2022 Translating SDTM Terminology and OMOP Vocabularies using the UMLS
William T. Roddy, Daniel Olson, Diane Corey, Ian Braun, Terrence McHugh, Emily Hartley, Smith Heavner, Ramona Walls
AMIA6
2021 A Responsive Data Curation and Integration Pipeline for Rare Disease Data
Ramona L. Walls, Jeffery S. Barrett, Alexandre Betourne, Emily Hartley, Jane Larkindale, Daniel Olson, William T. Roddy, Amanda Borens
AMIA4
2013 Understanding Bayesian Rooms Using Composite 3D Object Models
abstract
We develop a comprehensive Bayesian generative model for understanding indoor scenes. While it is common in this domain to approximate objects with 3D bounding boxes, we propose using strong representations with finer granularity. For example, we model a chair as a set of four legs, a seat and a backrest. We find that modeling detailed geometry improves recognition and reconstruction, and enables more refined use of appearance for scene understanding. We demonstrate this with a new likelihood function that rewards 3D object hypotheses whose 2D projection is more uniform in color distribution. Such a measure would be confused by background pixels if we used a bounding box to represent a concave object like a chair. Complex objects are modeled using a set or re-usable 3D parts, and we show that this representation captures much of the variation among object instances with relatively few parameters. We also designed specific data-driven inference mechanisms for each part that are shared by all objects containing that part, which helps make inference transparent to the modeler. Further, we show how to exploit contextual relationships to detect more objects, by, for example, proposing chairs around and underneath tables. We present results showing the benefits of each of these innovations. The performance of our approach often exceeds that of state-of-the-art methods on the two tasks of room layout estimation and object recognition, as evaluated on two bench mark data sets used in this domain.
Luca Del Pero, Joshua Bowdish, Bonnie Kermgard, Emily Hartley, Kobus Barnard
CVPR4
2012 Bayesian geometric modeling of indoor scenes
abstract
We propose a method for understanding the 3D geometry of indoor environments (e.g. bedrooms, kitchens) while simultaneously identifying objects in the scene (e.g. beds, couches, doors). We focus on how modeling the geometry and location of specific objects is helpful for indoor scene understanding. For example, beds are shorter than they are wide, and are more likely to be in the center of the room than cabinets, which are tall and narrow. We use a generative statistical model that integrates a camera model, an enclosing room “box”, frames (windows, doors, pictures), and objects (beds, tables, couches, cabinets), each with their own prior on size, relative dimensions, and locations. We fit the parameters of this complex, multi-dimensional statistical model using an MCMC sampling approach that combines discrete changes (e.g, adding a bed), and continuous parameter changes (e.g., making the bed larger). We find that introducing object category leads to state-of-the-art performance on room layout estimation, while also enabling recognition based only on geometry.
Luca Del Pero, Joshua Bowdish, Daniel Fried, Bonnie Kermgard, Emily Hartley, Kobus Barnard
CVPR5
2011 Fusing object detection and region appearance for image-text alignment
abstract
We present a method for automatically aligning words to image regions that integrates specific object classifiers (e.g., "car" detectors) with weak models based on appearance features. Previous strategies have largely focused on the latter, and thus have not exploited progress on object category recognition. Hence, we augment region labeling with object detection, which simplifies the problem by reliably identifying a subset of the labels, and thereby reducing correspondence ambiguity overall. Comprehensive testing on the SAIAPR TC dataset shows that principled integration of object detection improves the region labeling task.
Luca Del Pero, Philip Lee, James Magahern, Emily Hartley, Kobus Barnard, Atul Kanaujia, Niels Haering
ACM Multimedia4