Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lucy Liu
dblp:89/10862
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 39% Generative modeling · 34% Reinforcement learning · 26% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data integration and cleaning · 77% Data mining · 23% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ClavaDDPM: Multi-relational Data Synthesis with Cluster-guided Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
tabular data generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ClavaDDPM: Multi-relational Data Synthesis with Cluster-guided Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Data integration and cleaning › data generation
multi-relational data synthesis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ClavaDDPM: Multi-relational Data Synthesis with Cluster-guided Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explainable AI |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Reinforcement Learning Explainability via Model Transforms (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explainable reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Explainable Reinforcement Learning via Model Transforms · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Explainable Reinforcement Learning via Model Transforms · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
MDP abstraction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Explainable Reinforcement Learning via Model Transforms · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable reinforcement learning
policy explanation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Reinforcement Learning Explainability via Model Transforms (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | ClavaDDPM: Multi-relational Data Synthesis with Cluster-guided Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
latent variable propagation · 1.5cluster-guided diffusion · 1.5model transforms · 0.6formal MDP abstractions · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | ClavaDDPM: Multi-relational Data Synthesis with Cluster-guided Diffusion ModelsabstractRecent research in tabular data synthesis has focused on single tables, whereas real-world applications often involve complex data with tens or hundreds of interconnected tables. Previous approaches to synthesizing multi-relational (multi-table) data fall short in two key aspects: scalability for larger datasets and capturing long-range dependencies, such as correlations between attributes spread across different tables. Inspired by the success of diffusion models in tabular data modeling, we introduce
\textbf{C}luster \textbf{La}tent \textbf{Va}riable guided \textbf{D}enoising \textbf{D}iffusion \textbf{P}robabilistic \textbf{M}odels (ClavaDDPM). This novel approach leverages clustering labels as intermediaries to model relationships between tables, specifically focusing on foreign key constraints. ClavaDDPM leverages the robust generation capabilities of diffusion models while incorporating efficient algorithms to propagate the learned latent variables across tables. This enables ClavaDDPM to capture long-range dependencies effectively.
Extensive evaluations on multi-table datasets of varying sizes show that ClavaDDPM significantly outperforms existing methods for these long-range dependencies while remaining competitive on utility metrics for single-table data. Masoumeh Shafieinejad, Lucy Liu, Stephanie Hazlewood |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2022 | Reinforcement Learning Explainability via Model Transforms (Student Abstract)abstractUnderstanding the emerging behaviors of reinforcement learning agents may be difficult because such agents are often trained using highly complex and expressive models. In recent years, most approaches developed for explaining agent behaviors rely on domain knowledge or on an analysis of the agent’s learned policy. For some domains, relevant knowledge may not be available or may be insufficient for producing meaningful explanations. We suggest using formal model abstractions and transforms, previously used mainly for expediting the search for optimal policies, to automatically explain discrepancies that may arise between the behavior of an agent and the behavior that is anticipated by an observer. We formally define this problem of Reinforcement Learning Policy Explanation(RLPE), suggest a class of transforms which can be used for explaining emergent behaviors, and suggest meth-ods for searching efficiently for an explanation. We demonstrate the approach on standard benchmarks. Mira Finkelstein, Lucy Liu, Yoav Kolumbus, David C. Parkes, Jeffrey S. Rosenschein, Sarah Keren |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2022 | Explainable Reinforcement Learning via Model TransformsabstractUnderstanding emerging behaviors of reinforcement learning (RL) agents may be difficult since such agents are often trained in complex environments using highly complex decision making procedures. This has given rise to a variety of approaches to explainability in RL that aim to reconcile discrepancies that may arise between the behavior of an agent and the behavior that is anticipated by an observer. Most recent approaches have relied either on domain knowledge, that may not always be available, on an analysis of the agent’s policy, or on an analysis of specific elements of the underlying environment, typically modeled as a Markov Decision Process (MDP). Our key claim is that even if the underlying model is not fully known (e.g., the transition probabilities have not been accurately learned) or is not maintained by the agent (i.e., when using model-free methods), the model can nevertheless be exploited to automatically generate explanations. For this purpose, we suggest using formal MDP abstractions and transforms, previously used in the literature for expediting the search for optimal policies, to automatically produce explanations. Since such transforms are typically based on a symbolic representation of the environment, they can provide meaningful explanations for gaps between the anticipated and actual agent behavior. We formally define the explainability problem, suggest a class of transforms that can be used for explaining emergent behaviors, and suggest methods that enable efficient search for an explanation. We demonstrate the approach on a set of standard benchmarks. Mira Finkelstein, Nitsan Levy Schlot, Lucy Liu, Yoav Kolumbus, David C. Parkes, Jeffrey S. Rosenschein, Sarah Keren |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2006 | Periodic Jitter Amplitude Calibration with Walking StrobeabstractJitter insertion is a feature an automatic test equipment (ATE) provides for high speed SerDes device jitter tolerance testing. The amplitude of inserted periodic jitter (PJ) and its frequency are programmable. This article focuses on a technique developed to measure and calibrate the PJ amplitude of the ATE jitter insertion circuit. It uses a measurement tool called the walking strobe to systematically capture the jittered waveform and reconstruct it such that the jitter amplitude measurement consists of a series of edge time measurements. The method is accurate, fast, and low cost. This paper will also present experimental results Lucy Liu, Eddie Lew |
ITC | 1 |