Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sourav Chakraborty 0004

dblp:89/3488-4 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
anonymization
0.012004
Bottom-Up Generalization: A Data Mining Solution to Privacy Protection · ICDM 2004
Privacy and data protection › anonymization › syntactic anonymization
generalization-based anonymization
0.012004
Bottom-Up Generalization: A Data Mining Solution to Privacy Protection · ICDM 2004
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification
0.012004
Bottom-Up Generalization: A Data Mining Solution to Privacy Protection · ICDM 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

iterative generalization · 0.1bottom-up generalization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Bottom-Up Generalization: A Data Mining Solution to Privacy Protection
abstract
The well-known privacy-preserved data mining modifies existing data mining techniques to randomized data. In this paper, we investigate data mining as a technique for masking data, therefore, termed data mining based privacy protection. This approach incorporates partially the requirement of a targeted data mining task into the process of masking data so that essential structure is preserved in the masked data. The idea is simple but novel: we explore the data generalization concept from data mining as a way to hide detailed information, rather than discover trends and patterns. Once the data is masked, standard data mining techniques can be applied without modification. Our work demonstrated another positive use of data mining technology: not only can it discover useful patterns, but also mask private information. We consider the following privacy problem: a data holder wants to release a version of data for building classification models, but wants to protect against linking the released data to an external source for inferring sensitive information. We adapt an iterative bottom-up generalization from data mining to generalize the data. The generalized data remains useful to classification but becomes difficult to link to other sources. The generalization space is specified by a hierarchical structure of generalizations. A key is identifying the best generalization to climb up the hierarchy at each iteration. Enumerating all candidate generalizations is impractical. We present a scalable solution that examines at most one generalization in each iteration for each attribute involved in the linking.
Ke Wang 0001, Philip S. Yu, Sourav Chakraborty 0004
ICDM3