Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brian Thrall

dblp:89/7066 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene co-expression analysis
gene expression correlation
0.112008
Investigating the correspondence between transcriptomic and proteomic expression profiles using coupled cluster models · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology › multi-omics data integration
transcriptome-proteome integration
0.112008
Investigating the correspondence between transcriptomic and proteomic expression profiles using coupled cluster models · Bioinform. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic clustering · 0.1coupled mixture model · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Investigating the correspondence between transcriptomic and proteomic expression profiles using coupled cluster models
abstract
MOTIVATION: Modern transcriptomics and proteomics enable us to survey the expression of RNAs and proteins at large scales. While these data are usually generated and analyzed separately, there is an increasing interest in comparing and co-analyzing transcriptome and proteome expression data. A major open question is whether transcriptome and proteome expression is linked and how it is coordinated. RESULTS: Here we have developed a probabilistic clustering model that permits analysis of the links between transcriptomic and proteomic profiles in a sensible and flexible manner. Our coupled mixture model defines a prior probability distribution over the component to which a protein profile should be assigned conditioned on which component the associated mRNA profile belongs to. We apply this approach to a large dataset of quantitative transcriptomic and proteomic expression data obtained from a human breast epithelial cell line (HMEC). The results reveal a complex relationship between transcriptome and proteome with most mRNA clusters linked to at least two protein clusters, and vice versa. A more detailed analysis incorporating information on gene function from the Gene Ontology database shows that a high correlation of mRNA and protein expression is limited to the components of some molecular machines, such as the ribosome, cell adhesion complexes and the TCP-1 chaperonin involved in protein folding. AVAILABILITY: Matlab code is available from the authors on request.
Simon Rogers, Mark A. Girolami, Walter Kolch, Katrina M. Waters, Tao Liu 0003, Brian Thrall, H. Steven Wiley
Bioinform.6