Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mauro Stramazzotti

dblp:89/8707 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Network performance modeling · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network performance modeling
network modeling
0.112009
Comments on "Probability Distributions for the Number of Radio Transceivers which can Communicate with One Another" · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2009
Information theory › probability theory
stochastic geometry
0.012009
Comments on "Probability Distributions for the Number of Radio Transceivers which can Communicate with One Another" · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probability theory · 0.2poisson point process · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Comments on "Probability Distributions for the Number of Radio Transceivers which can Communicate with One Another"
abstract
We discuss the correctness of one of the main results of about the probability density function of the distance between two audible nodes in an infinite 2-dimensional scenario. We prove that result is wrong and derive a more general expression, which is valid for an infinite d-dimensional area. It is worth noting that, although the results on the distribution of the distance between two nodes are wrong, the other results and in particular the fact that the number of audible nodes in an arbitrary area is a Poisson r.v. is correct.
Alberto Zanella, Mauro Stramazzotti, Flavio Fabbri, Enrica Salbaroli, Davide Dardari, Roberto Verdone
IEEE Trans. Commun.2