Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Serge P. Yamajako

dblp:90/1009 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 67% Robot manipulation · 33%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot dynamics › contact dynamics
contact stability
0.011997
Stability of frictional contact in constrained rigid-body dynamics · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1997
Robotics › Robot manipulation › contact modeling
frictional contact
0.011997
Stability of frictional contact in constrained rigid-body dynamics · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1997
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot dynamics
0.011997
Stability of frictional contact in constrained rigid-body dynamics · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1997
Mathematical optimization
singular perturbation
0.011997
Stability of frictional contact in constrained rigid-body dynamics · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spring-damper contact model · 0.0singular perturbation analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Stability of frictional contact in constrained rigid-body dynamics
abstract
The use of rigid-body models during frictional contact is often justified by proving the existence of a unique solution to the forward dynamic equations. The implicit assumption here is that the contact forces so obtained are stable. In this paper, the rigid-body assumption is relaxed and body-to-body contacts are modeled using springs and dampers. A singular perturbation analysis reveals additional necessary conditions to ensure contact force stability in the reduced rigid-body model. Furthermore, the analysis indicates that stability depends on a damping ratio associated with the rigid contacts.
Pierre E. Dupont, Serge P. Yamajako
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom.2
1996 Stability of rigid-body dynamics with sliding frictional contacts
abstract
The use of rigid body models during frictional contact is often justified by proving the existence of a unique solution to the forward dynamic equations. The implicit assumption here is that the contact forces so obtained are stable. In this paper, the rigid-body assumption is relaxed and body-to-body contacts are modelled using springs and dampers. A singular perturbation analysis reveals additional necessary conditions to ensure contact force stability in the reduced rigid-body model. Furthermore, the analysis indicates that stability depends on a damping ratio associated with the rigid contacts.
Pierre E. Dupont, Serge P. Yamajako
ICRA2
1994 Jamming and Wedging in Constrained Rigid-Body Dynamics
abstract
It is well known that the introduction of Coulomb friction in rigid-body dynamics can lead to problems of existence and uniqueness in the forward equations. In this paper, it is shown that these problems relate to jamming and wedging. Separate conditions for jamming and wedging are provided in the three common formulations of constrained systems. These conditions are illustrated with examples.>
Pierre E. Dupont, Serge P. Yamajako
ICRA2