Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jan Peter Nap

dblp:90/2442 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
genome annotation visualization
0.112006
DNAVis: interactive visualization of comparative genome annotations · Bioinform. 2006
Visualization and visual analytics
biological data visualization
0.112006
DNAVis: interactive visualization of comparative genome annotations · Bioinform. 2006
Visualization and visual analytics › biological data visualization
interactive genome visualization
0.112006
DNAVis: interactive visualization of comparative genome annotations · Bioinform. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic zooming · 0.1perspective walls · 0.1linked views · 0.1dot plot · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 A verification protocol for the probe sequences of Affymetrix genome arrays reveals high probe accuracy for studies in mouse, human and rat
abstract
BACKGROUND: The Affymetrix GeneChip technology uses multiple probes per gene to measure its expression level. Individual probe signals can vary widely, which hampers proper interpretation. This variation can be caused by probes that do not properly match their target gene or that match multiple genes. To determine the accuracy of Affymetrix arrays, we developed an extensive verification protocol, for mouse arrays incorporating the NCBI RefSeq, NCBI UniGene Unique, NIA Mouse Gene Index, and UCSC mouse genome databases. RESULTS: Applying this protocol to Affymetrix Mouse Genome arrays (the earlier U74Av2 and the newer 430 2.0 array), the number of sequence-verified probes with perfect matches was no less than 85% and 95%, respectively; and for 74% and 85% of the probe sets all probes were sequence verified. The latter percentages increased to 80% and 94% after discarding one or two unverifiable probes per probe set, and even further to 84% and 97% when, in addition, allowing for one or two mismatches between probe and target gene. Similar results were obtained for other mouse arrays, as well as for human and rat arrays. Based on these data, refined chip definition files for all arrays are provided online. Researchers can choose the version appropriate for their study to (re)analyze expression data. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of Affymetrix probe sequences is higher than previously reported, particularly on newer arrays. Yet, refined probe set definitions have clear effects on the detection of differentially expressed genes. We demonstrate that the interpretation of the results of Affymetrix arrays is improved when the new chip definition files are used.
Rudi Alberts, Peter Terpstra, Menno Hardonk, Leonid V. Bystrykh, Gerald de Haan, Rainer Breitling, Jan Peter Nap, Ritsert C. Jansen
BMC Bioinform.7
2006 DNAVis: interactive visualization of comparative genome annotations
abstract
Abstract Summary: The software package DNAVis offers a fast, interactive and real-time visualization of DNA sequences and their comparative genome annotations. DNAVis implements advanced methods of information visualization such as linked views, perspective walls and semantic zooming, in addition to the display of heterologous data in dot plot-like matrix views. Availability: The software is freely available at ; the source code is available upon request. Contact: [email protected] Supplementary information: Figures are available at Bioinformatics online; documentation and data are available at
Mark W. E. J. Fiers, Huub van de Wetering, Tim H. J. M. Peeters, Jarke J. van Wijk, Jan Peter Nap
Bioinform.5
2004 Allermatch(tm), a webtool for the prediction of potential allergenicity according to current FAO/WHO Codex alimentarius guidelines
abstract
BACKGROUND: Novel proteins entering the food chain, for example by genetic modification of plants, have to be tested for allergenicity. Allermatch http://allermatch.org is a webtool for the efficient and standardized prediction of potential allergenicity of proteins and peptides according to the current recommendations of the FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, as outlined in the Codex alimentarius. DESCRIPTION: A query amino acid sequence is compared with all known allergenic proteins retrieved from the protein databases using a sliding window approach. This identifies stretches of 80 amino acids with more than 35% similarity or small identical stretches of at least six amino acids. The outcome of the analysis is presented in a concise format. The predictive performance of the FAO/WHO criteria is evaluated by screening sets of allergens and non-allergens against the Allermatch databases. Besides correct predictions, both methods are shown to generate false positive and false negative hits and the outcomes should therefore be combined with other methods of allergenicity assessment, as advised by the FAO/WHO. CONCLUSIONS: Allermatch provides an accessible, efficient, and useful webtool for analysis of potential allergenicity of proteins introduced in genetically modified food prior to market release that complies with current FAO/WHO guidelines.
Mark W. E. J. Fiers, Gijs A. Kleter, Herman Nijland, Jan Peter Nap, Roeland C. H. J. van Ham
BMC Bioinform.4