Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kristen Stubbs

dblp:90/2467 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 5 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Legged, aerial and field robots · 51% Multi-agent systems · 19% Robot manipulation · 19%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › interpersonal communication
common ground
0.122008
Using a robot proxy to create common ground in exploration tasks · HRI 2008
Challenges to grounding in human-robot interaction · HRI 2006
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
field robotics
0.122003
Heterogeneous implementation of an adaptive robotic sensing team · ICRA 2003
Mobility Enhancements to the Scout Robot Platform · ICRA 2002
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-robot systems
heterogeneous robot teams
0.012003
Heterogeneous implementation of an adaptive robotic sensing team · ICRA 2003
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot design
robot platform design
0.012003
Heterogeneous implementation of an adaptive robotic sensing team · ICRA 2003
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
miniature robot
0.012002
Mobility Enhancements to the Scout Robot Platform · ICRA 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.2ethnographic observation · 0.1heterogeneous sensing · 0.0grappling hook · 0.0actuating wheels · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 HRI pioneers workshop 2010
Katherine M. Tsui, Min Kyung Lee, Kristen Stubbs, Henriette Cramer, Laurel D. Riek, Ja-Young Sung, Hirotaka Osawa, Satoru Satake
HRI3
2008 Using a robot proxy to create common ground in exploration tasks
abstract
In this paper, we present a user study of a new collaborative communication method between a user and remotely-located robot performing an exploration task. In the studied scenario, our user possesses scientific expertise but not necessarily detailed knowledge of the robot's capabilities, resulting in very little common ground
Kristen Stubbs, David Wettergreen, Illah R. Nourbakhsh
HRI1
2006 Challenges to grounding in human-robot interaction
abstract
We report a study of a human-robot system composed of a science team (located in Pittsburgh), an engineering team (located in Chile), and a robot (located in Chile). We performed ethnographic observations simultaneously at both sites over two weeks as scientists collected data using the robot. Our data reveal problems in establishing and maintaining common ground between the science team and the robot due to missing contextual information about the robot. Our results have implications for the design of systems to support human-robot interaction.
Kristen Stubbs, Pamela J. Hinds, David Wettergreen
HRI1
2006 Cognitive Evaluation of Human-Robot Systems: A Method for Analyzing Cognitive Change in Human-Robot Systems
abstract
To help answer questions about the behavior of participants in human-robot systems, we propose the cognitive evaluation of human-robot systems (CEHRS) method based on our work with the personal exploration rover (PER). The CEHRS method consists of six steps: (1) identify all system participants, (2) collect data from all participant groups, including the system's creators, (3) analyze participant data in light of system-wide goals, (4) answer targeted questions about each participant group to determine the flow of knowledge, information, and influence throughout the system, (5) look for inconsistencies in the knowledge and beliefs of different participant groups, and (6) make recommendations for improvement. We offer this comprehensive, human-centered evaluation method as a starting point for future work in understanding cognitive change in human-robot interactions
Kristen Stubbs, Debra Bernstein, Kevin Crowley, Illah R. Nourbakhsh
RO-MAN1
2005 Long-Term Human-Robot Interaction: The Personal Exploration Rover and Museum Docents
Kristen Stubbs, Debra Bernstein, Kevin Crowley, Illah R. Nourbakhsh
AIED1
2003 Heterogeneous implementation of an adaptive robotic sensing team
abstract
When designing a mobile robotic team, an engineer is faced with many design choices. This paper discusses the design of a team consisting of two different models of robots with significantly different sensing and control capabilities intended to accomplish a similar task. Two new robotic platforms, the COTS Scout and the MegaScout are described along with their respective design considerations.
Bradley Kratochvil, Ian T. Burt, Andrew Drenner, Derek Goerke, Bennett Jackson, Colin McMillen, Christopher Olson, Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos, Adam Pfeifer, Sascha Stoeter, Kristen Stubbs, David Waletzko
ICRA11
2002 Mobility Enhancements to the Scout Robot Platform
abstract
When a distributed robotic system is assigned to perform reconnaissance or surveillance, restrictions inherent to the design of an individual robot limit the system's performance in certain environments. Finding an ideal portable robotic platform capable of deploying and returning information in spatially restrictive areas is not a simple task. The Scout robot, developed at the University of Minnesota, is a viable robotic platform for these types of missions. The small form factor of the Scout allows for deployment, placement, and concealment of a team of robots equipped with a variety of sensory packages. However, the design of the Scout requires a compromise in power, sensor types, locomotion, and size; together these factors prevent an individual Scout from operating ideally in some environments. Several attempts to address these deficiencies have been implemented and are discussed. Among the prototype solutions are actuating wheels, allowing the Scout to increase ground clearance in varying terrains, a grappling hook enabling the Scout to obtain a position of elevated observation, and infrared emitters to facilitate low light operation.
Andrew Drenner, Ian T. Burt, Tom Dahlin, Bradley Kratochvil, Colin McMillen, Bradley J. Nelson, Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos, Paul E. Rybski, Kristen Stubbs, David Waletzko, Kemal Berk Yesin
ICRA9