Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Steven Rehfuss
dblp:90/4407
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 80% Question answering and dialogue systems · 20% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology |
0.0 | 2 | 1987 | Ontological Analysis: An Ongoing Experiment · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1987 Knowledge Level Engineering Ontological Analysis · AAAI 1986 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge level analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | Knowledge Level Engineering Ontological Analysis · AAAI 1986 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
natural language interface |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | An Eclectic Approach to Building Natural Languages Interfaces · ACL 1985 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
expert systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | An Eclectic Approach to Building Natural Languages Interfaces · ACL 1985 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ontological analysis · 0.0semantic grammar · 0.0lexical-functional grammar · 0.0incremental parsing · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | Input variable selection for neural networks: application to predicting the U.S. business cycleabstractSelecting a "best subset" of input variables is a critical issue in forecasting. This is especially true when the number of available input series is large, and an exhaustive search through all combinations of variables is computationally infeasible. Inclusion of irrelevant variables not only doesn't help prediction, but can reduce forecasting accuracy through added noise or systematic bias. We demonstrate a technique called "sensitivity-based pruning" (SBP) that removes irrelevant input variables from a nonlinear forecasting or regression model. The technique makes use of a saliency measure computed for each input variable and uses estimates of prediction risk for determining the number of input variables to prune. We present preliminary results of the SBP technique applied to neural network predictors of a key business cycle measure, the US Index of Industrial Production. Joachim Utans, John E. Moody, Steven Rehfuss, Hava T. Siegelmann |
CIFEr | 3 |
| 1995 | Model Matching and SFMD Computation
Steven Rehfuss, Dan W. Hammerstrom |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1987 | Ontological Analysis: An Ongoing Experiment
James H. Alexander, Michael J. Freiling, Sheryl Shulman, Steven Rehfuss, Steven Messick |
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. | 4 |
| 1986 | Knowledge Level Engineering Ontological Analysis
James H. Alexander, Michael J. Freiling, Sheryl Shulman, Jeffery Staley, Steven Rehfuss, Steven Messick |
AAAI | 5 |
| 1985 | An Eclectic Approach to Building Natural Languages InterfacesabstractINKA is a natural language interface to facilitate knowledge acquisition during expert system development for electronic instrument trouble-shooting. The expert system design methodology develops a domain definition, called GLIB, in the form of a semantic grammar. This grammar format enables GLIB to be used with the INGLISH interface, which constrains users to create statements within a subset of English. Incremental parsing in INGLISH allows immediate remedial information to be generated if a user deviates from the sublanguage. Sentences are translated into production rules using the methodology of lexical-functional grammar. The system is written in Smalltalk and, in INKA, produces rules for a Prolog inference engine. Brian Phillips, Michael J. Freiling, James H. Alexander, Steven Messick, Steven Rehfuss, Sheldon Nicholl |
ACL | 5 |