Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ilse Lievens

dblp:90/4687 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Optical networks · 65% Internet of things and sensor networks · 24% Network optimization and economics · 7%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Optical networks
optical network design
0.112006
Next Generation Optical Scientific Network · INFOCOM 2006
Internet of things and sensor networks › topology control
topology optimization
0.112006
Next Generation Optical Scientific Network · INFOCOM 2006
Optical networks
IP over optical networks
0.012002
Data-centric optical networks and their survivability · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2002
Optical networks
network survivability
0.012002
Data-centric optical networks and their survivability · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2002
Optical networks
optical transmission
0.012002
Data-centric optical networks and their survivability · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2002
Network optimization and economics › network design
capacity planning
0.012006
Next Generation Optical Scientific Network · INFOCOM 2006
Internet architecture and protocols › network architecture design › layered architecture › protocol layering › network layer
IP network
0.012002
Data-centric optical networks and their survivability · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization · 0.1simulation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 A Quantitative Comparison of Some Resilience Mechanisms in a Multidomain IP-over-Optical Network Environment
abstract
When we examine today's internet architecture, we notice that the IP layer network is divided into multiple domains, managed by different service providers, operating different architectures, providing different services, handling different business strategies. In order to provide survivable inter-domain connections, to ensure connectivity in case of the most prevalent failures, different strategies can be followed. In this paper, we present some multidomain resilience schemes for a single optical backbone network interconnecting different IP domains. We then present a quantitative study of the network capacity required, in a specific pan-European backbone network.
Dimitri Staessens, Leen Depré, Didier Colle, Ilse Lievens, Mario Pickavet, Piet Demeester
ICC4
2006 Next Generation Optical Scientific Network
abstract
Today, the Belgian research network GIGANET, managed by BELNET, consists of two star-shaped structures, centralized in Brussels, from where data transmission lines depart to national PoPs (point-of-presence), which are located all over the country. Local universities, colleges and other research institutions connect to their nearest PoP. Current capacity is way below predictions for the near future, thus the network needs to be scaled up dramatically. Also, there is a new demand for securely connecting distant institutions, due to several associations between them. We studied the optimal design of the future next-generation network GIGANET2, choosing a new topology, predicting future capacity demands and taking into account real pricing information obtained from telecom companies and optical hardware vendors. The study consisted of involved optimization efforts, and large-scale comparisons of optical hardware and available fiber infrastructure. This work resulted in the design of a physical optical ring topology, together with three network scenarios which are subject to different bandwidth, reliability and cost considerations, closely matching the institutions' requirements. This paper presents the final results of the study.
Pieter Audenaert, Sofie Verbrugge, Leen Depré, Didier Colle, Ilse Lievens, Mario Pickavet, Piet Demeester, W. Derijnck, P. Van Hecke, J. Valcke, J. Torreele
INFOCOM5
2002 Data-centric optical networks and their survivability
abstract
The explosive growth of data traffic-for example, due to the popularity of the Internet-poses important emerging network requirements on today's telecommunication networks. This paper describes how core networks will evolve to optical transport networks (OTNs), which are optimized for the transport of data traffic, resulting in an IP-directly-over-OTN paradigm. Special attention is paid to the survivability of such data-centric optical networks. This becomes increasingly crucial since more and more traffic is multiplexed onto a single fiber (e.g., 160/spl times/10 Gb/s), implying that a single cable cut can affect incredible large traffic volumes. In particular, this paper is tackling multilayer survivability problems, since a data-centric optical network consists of at least an IP and optical layer. In practice, this means that the questions "in which layer or layers should survivability be provided?" and "if multiple layers are chosen for this purpose, then how should this functionality in these layers be coordinated?" have to be answered. In addition to a theoretical study, some case studies are presented in order to illustrate the relevance of the described issues and to help in strategic planning decisions. Two case studies are studying the problem from a capacity viewpoint. Another case study presents simulations from a timing/throughput performance viewpoint.
Didier Colle, Sophie De Maesschalck, Chris Develder, Pim Van Heuven, Adelbert Groebbens, Jan Cheyns, Ilse Lievens, Mario Pickavet, Paul Lagasse, Piet Demeester
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.7