Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Klaus Isak

dblp:90/6388 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Services computing and microservices · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge-based systems
0.112007
The VITA Financial Services Sales Support Environment · AAAI 2007
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Status Quo Bias in Configuration Systems
Monika Mandl, Alexander Felfernig, Juha Tiihonen, Klaus Isak
IEA/AIE (1)4
2009 Automated debugging of recommender user interface descriptions
Alexander Felfernig, Gerhard Friedrich, Klaus Isak, Konstantin Schekotihin, Erich Christian Teppan, Dietmar Jannach
Appl. Intell.3
2008 Intelligent debugging and repair of utility constraint sets in knowledge-based recommender applications
abstract
Recommenders support effective product retrieval processes for online users. These systems propose repair actions in situations where no solution can be found and derive recommendations including a set of explanations as to why a certain product has been selected. In this context utility constraints (scoring rules) have to be defined which specify the way utilities of products, explanations, and repair alternatives are determined. Such constraints can be faulty which means that they calculate rankings in a way not expected by marketing and sales experts. The maintenance and repair of such constraints is an extremely error-prone task. In this paper we present an intelligent environment which supports the automated adaptation of faulty utility constraints taking into account existing marketing and sales requirements. In this context we discuss experiences from commercial projects.
Alexander Felfernig, Erich Christian Teppan, Gerhard Friedrich, Klaus Isak
IUI4
2007 The VITA Financial Services Sales Support Environment
Alexander Felfernig, Klaus Isak, Kalman Szabo, Peter Zachar
AAAI2
2006 Knowledge-Based Recommendation: Technologies and Experiences from Projects
Alexander Felfernig, Klaus Isak, Christian Russ 0002
ECAI2