Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dor Kedem
dblp:91/11349
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
metric learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Non-linear Metric Learning · NIPS 2012 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › metric learning
nonlinear metric learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Non-linear Metric Learning · NIPS 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient boosting · 0.1chi-squared distance · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Non-linear Metric LearningabstractIn this paper, we introduce two novel metric learning algorithms, χ2-LMNN and GB-LMNN, which are explicitly designed to be non-linear and easy-to-use. The two approaches achieve this goal in fundamentally different ways: χ2-LMNN inherits the computational benefits of a linear mapping from linear metric learning, but uses a non-linear χ2-distance to explicitly capture similarities within histogram data sets; GB-LMNN applies gradient-boosting to learn non-linear mappings directly in function space and takes advantage of this approach's robustness, speed, parallelizability and insensitivity towards the single additional hyper-parameter. On various benchmark data sets, we demonstrate these methods not only match the current state-of-the-art in terms of kNN classification error, but in the case of χ2-LMNN, obtain best results in 19 out of 20 learning settings. Dor Kedem, Stephen Tyree, Kilian Q. Weinberger, Fei Sha, Gert R. G. Lanckriet |
NIPS | 1 |