Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tarvo Raudvere

dblp:91/2546 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 4 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
formal verification
0.112008
Application and Verification of Local Nonsemantic-Preserving Transformations in System Design · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2008
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.112008
Application and Verification of Local Nonsemantic-Preserving Transformations in System Design · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2008
Electronic design automation
system-level design
0.112008
Application and Verification of Local Nonsemantic-Preserving Transformations in System Design · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2008
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
static analysis
0.012008
Application and Verification of Local Nonsemantic-Preserving Transformations in System Design · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

static analysis · 0.1formal verification · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Application and Verification of Local Nonsemantic-Preserving Transformations in System Design
abstract
Due to the increasing abstraction gap between the initial system model and a final implementation, the verification of the respective models against each other is a formidable task. This paper addresses the verification problem by proposing a stepwise application of combined refinement and verification activities in the context of synchronous model of computation. An implementation model is developed from the system model by applying predefined design transformations which are as follows: 1) semantic preserving or 2) nonsemantic preserving. Nonsemantic-preserving transformations introduce lower level implementation details, which are necessary to yield an efficient implementation. Our approach divides the verification tasks into two activities: 1) the local correctness of a refined block is checked by using formal verification tools and predefined properties, which are developed for each nonsemantic-preserving transformation, and 2) the global influence of the refinement to the entire system is studied through static analysis. We illustrate the design refinement and verification approach with three transformations: 1) a communication refinement mapping a synchronous channel to an asynchronous one including a handshake mechanism; 2) a computation refinement, which introduces resource sharing in a combinational computation block; and 3) a synchronization demanding refinement, where an algorithm analyzes the influence of a local refinement to the temporal properties of the entire system and restores the system's correct temporal behavior if necessary.
Tarvo Raudvere, Ingo Sander, Axel Jantsch
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.1
2007 A synchronization algorithm for local temporal refinements in perfectly synchronous models with nested feedback loops
abstract
Due to the abstract and simple computation and communication mechanism in the synchronous computational model it is easy to simulate synchronous systems and to apply formal verification methods. In synchronous models, a local temporal refinement that increases the delay in a single computation block may affect the functionality of the entire model. To preserve the system's functionality after temporal refinements we provide a synchronization algorithm that applies also to models with nested feedback loops. The algorithm adds pure delay elements to the model in order to balance the delay caused by refinement and to assure concurrent data arrival at computation blocks. It is done so that the refined model stays latency equivalent to the original model. The advantages of our approach are that (a) we remain fully within the synchronous model of computation, (b) we preserve the functionality of the existing computation blocks, and (c) we do not require additional computation resources, wrapper circuits or schedulers.
Tarvo Raudvere, Ingo Sander, Axel Jantsch
ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI1
2005 System level verification of digital signal processing applications based on the polynomial abstraction technique
abstract
Polynomial abstraction has been developed for data abstraction of sequential circuits, where the functionality can be expressed as polynomials. The method, based on the fundamental theorem of algebra, abstracts a possibly infinite domain of input values, into a much smaller and finite one, whose size is calculated according to the degree of the respective polynomial. The abstract model preserves the system's control and data properties, which can be verified by model checking. Experiments show that our approach does not only allow an automatic verification, but also gives considerably better results than existing methods.
Tarvo Raudvere, Ashish Kumar Singh, Ingo Sander, Axel Jantsch
ICCAD1
2004 Polynomial Abstraction for Verification of Sequentially Implemented Combinational Circuits
abstract
Today's integrated circuits with increasing complexity cause the well known state space explosion problem in verification tools. In order to handle this problem a much simpler abstract model of the design has to be created for verification. We introduce the polynomial abstraction technique, which efficiently simplifies the verification task of sequential design blocks whose functionality can be expressed as a polynomial. Through our technique, the domains of possible values of data input signals can be reduced. This is done in such a way that the abstract model is still valid for model checking of the design functionality in terms of the system's control and data properties. We incorporate polynomial abstraction into the ForSyDe methodology, for the verification of clock domain design refinements.
Tarvo Raudvere, Ashish Kumar Singh, Ingo Sander, Axel Jantsch
DATE1