Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dmitry Kropotov

dblp:91/3126 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-0970-5184ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 78% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 15% Deep learning architectures and training · 7%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic optimization
finite-sum optimization
0.212016
A Superlinearly-Convergent Proximal Newton-type Method for the Optimization of Finite Sums · ICML 2016
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization
0.212016
A Superlinearly-Convergent Proximal Newton-type Method for the Optimization of Finite Sums · ICML 2016
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction
0.212016
A Superlinearly-Convergent Proximal Newton-type Method for the Optimization of Finite Sums · ICML 2016
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.112007
On one method of non-diagonal regularization in sparse Bayesian learning · ICML 2007
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › sparse bayesian learning
relevance vector machine
0.112007
On one method of non-diagonal regularization in sparse Bayesian learning · ICML 2007
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
sparse bayesian learning
0.112007
On one method of non-diagonal regularization in sparse Bayesian learning · ICML 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

superlinear convergence analysis · 0.2proximal newton method · 0.2laplace prior · 0.1hessian diagonalization · 0.1gaussian prior · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 MARS: Masked Automatic Ranks Selection in Tensor Decompositions
abstract
Tensor decomposition methods have proven effective in various applications, including compression and acceleration of neural networks. At the same time, the problem of determining optimal decomposition ranks, which present the crucial parameter controlling the compressionaccuracy trade-off, is still acute. In this paper, we introduce MARS - a new efficient method for the automatic selection of ranks in general tensor decompositions. During training, the procedure learns binary masks over decomposition cores that “select” the optimal tensor structure. The learning is performed via relaxed maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation in a specific Bayesian model and can be naturally embedded into the standard neural network training routine. Diverse experiments demonstrate that MARS achieves better results compared to previous works in various tasks.
Maxim Kodryan, Dmitry Kropotov, Dmitry P. Vetrov
AISTATS2
2018 Scalable Gaussian Processes with Billions of Inducing Inputs via Tensor Train Decomposition
abstract
We propose a method (TT-GP) for approximate inference in Gaussian Process (GP) models. We build on previous scalable GP research including stochastic variational inference based on inducing inputs, kernel interpolation, and structure exploiting algebra. The key idea of our method is to use Tensor Train decomposition for variational parameters, which allows us to train GPs with billions of inducing inputs and achieve state-of-the-art results on several benchmarks. Further, our approach allows for training kernels based on deep neural networks without any modifications to the underlying GP model. A neural network learns a multidimensional embedding for the data, which is used by the GP to make the final prediction. We train GP and neural network parameters end-to-end without pretraining, through maximization of GP marginal likelihood. We show the efficiency of the proposed approach on several regression and classification benchmark datasets including MNIST, CIFAR-10, and Airline.
Pavel Izmailov, Alexander Novikov 0001, Dmitry Kropotov
AISTATS3
2016 A Superlinearly-Convergent Proximal Newton-type Method for the Optimization of Finite Sums
abstract
We consider the problem of minimizing the strongly convex sum of a finite number of convex functions. Standard algorithms for solving this problem in the class of incremental/stochastic methods have at most a linear convergence rate. We propose a new incremental method whose convergence rate is superlinear – the Newton-type incremental method (NIM). The idea of the method is to introduce a model of the objective with the same sum-of-functions structure and further update a single component of the model per iteration. We prove that NIM has a superlinear local convergence rate and linear global convergence rate. Experiments show that the method is very effective for problems with a large number of functions and a small number of variables.
Anton Rodomanov, Dmitry Kropotov
ICML2
2007 On one method of non-diagonal regularization in sparse Bayesian learning
abstract
In the paper we propose a new type of regularization procedure for training sparse Bayesian methods for classification. Transforming Hessian matrix of log-likelihood function to diagonal form with further regularization of its eigenvectors allows us to optimize evidence explicitly as a product of one-dimensional integrals. The process of automatic regularization coefficients determination then converges in one iteration. We show how to use the proposed approach for Gaussian and Laplace priors. Both algorithms show comparable performance with the state-of-the-art Relevance Vector Machines (RVM) but require less time for training and produce more sparse decision rules (in terms of degrees of freedom).
Dmitry Kropotov, Dmitry P. Vetrov
ICML1
2006 The Use of Stability Principle for Kernel Determination in Relevance Vector Machines
Dmitry Kropotov, Dmitry P. Vetrov, Nikita Ptashko, Oleg Vasiliev
ICONIP (1)1
2005 The Use of Bayesian Framework for Kernel Selection in Vector Machines Classifiers
Dmitry Kropotov, Nikita Ptashko, Dmitry P. Vetrov
CIARP1