Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel P. McReynolds
dblp:91/4155
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
3D vision · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision › structure from motion
rigidity checking |
0.0 | 2 | 1996 | Rigidity Checking of 3D Point Correspondences Under Perspective Projection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1996 Rigidity Checking of 3D Point Correspondences under Perspective Projection · ICCV 1995 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Rigidity Checking of 3D Point Correspondences Under Perspective Projection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1996 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › camera calibration › camera model
perspective projection |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Rigidity Checking of 3D Point Correspondences under Perspective Projection · ICCV 1995 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching
point correspondence |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Rigidity Checking of 3D Point Correspondences under Perspective Projection · ICCV 1995 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Rigidity Checking of 3D Point Correspondences Under Perspective Projection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1996 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear algorithm · 0.03d recovery equations · 0.0linear 3d recovery · 0.0disparity analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | Rigidity Checking of 3D Point Correspondences Under Perspective ProjectionabstractAn algorithm is described which rapidly verifies the potential rigidity of three-dimensional point correspondences from a pair of two-dimensional views under perspective projection. The output of the algorithm is a simple yes or no answer to the question "Could these corresponding points from two views be the projection of a rigid configuration?" Potential applications include 3D object recognition from a single previous view and correspondence matching for stereo or motion over widely separated views. The rigidity checking problem is different from the structure-from-motion problem because it is often the case that two views cannot provide an accurate structure-from-motion estimate due to ambiguity and ill conditioning, whereas it is still possible to give an accurate yes/no answer to the rigidity question. Rigidity checking verifies point correspondences using 3D recovery equations as a matching condition. The proposed algorithm improves upon other methods that fall under this approach because it works with as few as six corresponding points under full perspective projection, handles correspondences from widely separated views, makes full use of the disparity of the correspondences, and is integrated with a linear algorithm for 3D recovery due to Kontsevich (1993). Results are given for experiments with synthetic and real image data. A complete implementation of this algorithm is being made publicly available. Daniel P. McReynolds, David G. Lowe |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 1995 | Rigidity Checking of 3D Point Correspondences under Perspective ProjectionabstractAn algorithm is described which rapidly verifies the potential rigidity of three dimensional point correspondences from a pair of three dimensional views under perspective projection. The output of the algorithm is a simple yes or no answer to the question "Could these corresponding points from two views be the projection of a rigid configuration?" Potential applications include 3D object recognition from a single previous view and correspondence matching for stereo or motion over widely separated views. Rigidity checking verifies point correspondences by using 3D recovery equations as a matching condition. The proposed algorithm improves upon other methods that fall under this approach because it works with as few as six corresponding points under full perspective projection, handles correspondences from widely separated views, makes full use of the disparity of the correspondences, and is integrated with a linear algorithm for 3D recovery due to Kontsevich (1991). Results are given for experiments with synthetic and real image data. A complete implementation of this algorithm is being made publicly available.> Daniel P. McReynolds, David G. Lowe |
ICCV | 1 |