Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John S. Garofolo

dblp:91/4647 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
20ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 14 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 13 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 84% Image and video processing · 16%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › video analysis
object detection and tracking
0.112009
Framework for Performance Evaluation of Face, Text, and Vehicle Detection and Tracking in Video: Data, Metrics, and Protocol · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2009
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › object detection
face detection
0.012009
Framework for Performance Evaluation of Face, Text, and Vehicle Detection and Tracking in Video: Data, Metrics, and Protocol · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2009
Image and video processing › pattern detection
scene text detection
0.012009
Framework for Performance Evaluation of Face, Text, and Vehicle Detection and Tracking in Video: Data, Metrics, and Protocol · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2009
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › object detection
vehicle detection
0.012009
Framework for Performance Evaluation of Face, Text, and Vehicle Detection and Tracking in Video: Data, Metrics, and Protocol · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

scoring software · 0.1ground truth annotation · 0.1baseline algorithms · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 AVSS Multiple Camera Person Tracking Challenge Evaluation Overview
abstract
Technologies that track a specific person as they traverse a network of surveillance cameras can be used as the basis for a multitude of video surveillance applications including mass transit monitoring, large venue security, building security, and the like. In order to continue supporting the development robust people tracking technologies, the first AVSS Multiple Camera Person Tracking (MCPT) Challenge Evaluation was established to provide data and evaluation resources for researchers to build Single Person Tracking (SPT) technologies. This special session will focus on the AVSS MCPT Challenge Evaluation which will include a description of the evaluation task, the i-LIDS Multiple-camera tracking scenario data set used for the evaluation, and presentations by the challenge evaluation participants describing their systems.
Jon Fiscus, John S. Garofolo, R. Travis Rose, Martial Michel
AVSS2
2009 The TRECVid 2008 Event Detection evaluation
abstract
This paper is a summary of the 2008 TRECVid Event Detection evaluation track. TRECVid is a laboratory-style evaluation that aims to model real world situations or significant component tasks. The event detection evaluation was organized to address detection of a set of specific events that would be of potential interest to an operator in the surveillance domain. This paper describes the video data, evaluation tasks, evaluation metrics, and results of the event detection evaluation.
R. Travis Rose, Jon Fiscus, Paul Over, John S. Garofolo, Martial Michel
WACV4
2009 Framework for Performance Evaluation of Face, Text, and Vehicle Detection and Tracking in Video: Data, Metrics, and Protocol
abstract
Common benchmark data sets, standardized performance metrics, and baseline algorithms have demonstrated considerable impact on research and development in a variety of application domains. These resources provide both consumers and developers of technology with a common framework to objectively compare the performance of different algorithms and algorithmic improvements. In this paper, we present such a framework for evaluating object detection and tracking in video: specifically for face, text, and vehicle objects. This framework includes the source video data, ground-truth annotations (along with guidelines for annotation), performance metrics, evaluation protocols, and tools including scoring software and baseline algorithms. For each detection and tracking task and supported domain, we developed a 50-clip training set and a 50-clip test set. Each data clip is approximately 2.5 minutes long and has been completely spatially/temporally annotated at the I-frame level. Each task/domain, therefore, has an associated annotated corpus of approximately 450,000 frames. The scope of such annotation is unprecedented and was designed to begin to support the necessary quantities of data for robust machine learning approaches, as well as a statistically significant comparison of the performance of algorithms. The goal of this work was to systematically address the challenges of object detection and tracking through a common evaluation framework that permits a meaningful objective comparison of techniques, provides the research community with sufficient data for the exploration of automatic modeling techniques, encourages the incorporation of objective evaluation into the development process, and contributes useful lasting resources of a scale and magnitude that will prove to be extremely useful to the computer vision research community for years to come.
Rangachar Kasturi, Dmitry B. Goldgof, Padmanabhan Soundararajan, Vasant Manohar, John S. Garofolo, Rachel Bowers, Matthew Boonstra, Valentina N. Korzhova, Jing Zhang 0053
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.5
2007 Directions in automatic video analysis evaluations at NIST
abstract
NIST has been conducting a series of evaluations in the automatic analysis of information in video since 2001. These began within the NIST text retrieval evaluation (TREC) as a pilot track in searching for information in large collections of video. The evaluation series was spun off into its own evaluation/workshop series called TRECVID. TRECVID continues to examine the challenge of extracting features for search technologies. In 2004, NIST also began an evaluation series dedicated to assessing video object detection and tracking technologies using training and test sets that were significantly larger than those used in the past -facilitating novel machine learning approaches and supporting statistically-informative evaluation results. Eventually this effort was merged with other video processing evaluations being implemented in Europe under the classification of events, activities, and relationships (CLEAR) consortium. NIST's goal is to evolve these evaluations of video processing technologies towards a focus on the detection of visually observable events and 3D modeling and to help the computer vision community make strides in the areas of accuracy, robustness, and efficiency.
John S. Garofolo
AVSS1
2006 Performance Evaluation of Object Detection and Tracking in Video
Vasant Manohar, Padmanabhan Soundararajan, Harish Raju, Dmitry B. Goldgof, Rangachar Kasturi, John S. Garofolo
ACCV (2)6
2006 Performance Evaluation of Text Detection and Tracking in Video
Vasant Manohar, Padmanabhan Soundararajan, Matthew Boonstra, Harish Raju, Dmitry B. Goldgof, Rangachar Kasturi, John S. Garofolo
Document Analysis Systems7
2004 The NIST Meeting Room Pilot Corpus
John S. Garofolo, Christophe Laprun, Martial Michel, Vincent M. Stanford, Elham Tabassi
LREC1
2004 NIST Language Technology Evaluation Cookbook
Alvin F. Martin, John S. Garofolo, Jon Fiscus, Audrey N. Le, David S. Pallett, Mark A. Przybocki, Gregory A. Sanders
LREC2
2003 The NIST Smart Space and Meeting Room projects: signals, acquisition annotation, and metrics
abstract
Pervasive computing devices, sensors, and networks, provide infrastructure for context aware smart meeting rooms that sense ongoing human activities and respond to them. This requires advances in areas including networking, distributed computing, sensor data acquisition, signal processing, speech recognition, human identification, and natural language processing. Open interoperability and metrology standards for the sensor and recognition technologies can aid R&D programs in making these advances. The NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) Smart Space and Meeting Room projects are developing tools for data formats, transport, distributed processing, and metadata. We are using them to create annotated multi modal research corpora and measurement algorithms for smart meeting rooms, which we are making available to the research and development community.
Vincent M. Stanford, John S. Garofolo, Olivier Galibert, Martial Michel, Christophe Laprun
ICASSP (4)2
2002 Effects of word error rate in the DARPA communicator data during 2000 and 2001
abstract
During 2000 and 2001 two large data collections were performed, with paid users. We analyze the effects of speech recognition accuracy, as measured by Word Error Rate (WER), on other metrics. Analysis shows a linear correlation between WER and the Task Completion metrics, and (unexpectedly) this relationship remains more or less linear even for quite high values of WER. The picture for User Satisfaction metrics is more complex, and a linear model derived from the data by using the PARADISE framework [1] is given by Walker et al. [2]. We present evidence suggesting a somewhat linear relationship between WER and User Satisfaction for WER less than 35% or 40% in 2001, compared to stronger correlations in 2000. Finally, we note that the size of effect of increasing WER on Task Completion (slope of the least-squares regression line) appears to be about half as large in 2001 as in 2000, which we attribute to improved strategies for accomplishing tasks despite speech recognition errors. We consider this to be an important accomplishment of the research groups who built the Communicator implementations.
Gregory A. Sanders, Audrey N. Le, John S. Garofolo
INTERSPEECH3
2002 DARPA communicator evaluation: progress from 2000 to 2001
abstract
This paper describes the evaluation methodology and results of the DARPA Communicator spoken dialog system evaluation experiments in 2000 and 2001. Nine spoken dialog systems in the travel planning domain participated in the experiments resulting in a total corpus of 1904 dialogs. We describe and compare the experimental design of the 2000 and 2001 DARPA evaluations. We describe how we established a performance baseline in 2001 for complex tasks. We present our overall approach to data collection, the metrics collected, and the application of PARADISE to these data sets. We compare the results we achieved in 2000 for a number of core metrics with those for 2001. These results demonstrate large performance improvements from 2000 to 2001 and show that the Communicator program goal of conversational interaction for complex tasks has been achieved.
Marilyn A. Walker, Alexander I. Rudnicky, John S. Aberdeen, Elizabeth Owen Bratt, John S. Garofolo, Helen Hastie, Audrey N. Le, Bryan L. Pellom, Alexandros Potamianos, Rebecca J. Passonneau, Rashmi Prasad, Salim Roukos, Gregory A. Sanders, Stephanie Seneff, David Stallard
INTERSPEECH5
2002 DARPA communicator: cross-system results for the 2001 evaluation
abstract
This paper describes the evaluation methodology and results of the 2001 DARPA Communicator evaluation. The experiment spanned 6 months of 2001 and involved eight DARPA Communicator systems in the travel planning domain. It resulted in a corpus of 1242 dialogs which include many more dialogues for complex tasks than the 2000 evaluation. We describe the experimental design, the approach to data collection, and the results. We compare the results by the type of travel plan and by system. The results demonstrate some large differences across sites and show that the complex trips are clearly more difficult.
Marilyn A. Walker, Alexander I. Rudnicky, Rashmi Prasad, John S. Aberdeen, Elizabeth Owen Bratt, John S. Garofolo, Helen Hastie, Audrey N. Le, Bryan L. Pellom, Alexandros Potamianos, Rebecca J. Passonneau, Salim Roukos, Gregory A. Sanders, Stephanie Seneff, David Stallard
INTERSPEECH6
2002 NIST Rich Transcription 2002 Evaluation: A Preview
John S. Garofolo, Jon Fiscus, Alvin F. Martin, David S. Pallett, Mark A. Przybocki
LREC1
2002 A Pratical Introduction to ATLAS
Christophe Laprun, Jon Fiscus, John S. Garofolo, Sylvain Pajot
LREC3
2001 DARPA communicator dialog travel planning systems: the june 2000 data collection
abstract
This paper describes results of an experiment with 9 different DARPA Communicator Systems who participated in the June 2000 data collection. All systems supported travel planning and utilized some form of mixed-initiative interaction. However they varied in several critical dimensions: (1) They targeted different back-end databases for travel information; (2) The used different modules for ASR,NLU,TTS and dialog management. We describe the experimental design, the approach to data collection, the metrics collected, and results comparing the systems. 1.
Marilyn A. Walker, John S. Aberdeen, Julie E. Boland, Elizabeth Owen Bratt, John S. Garofolo, Lynette Hirschman, Audrey N. Le, Sungbok Lee, Shri Narayanan, Kishore Papineni, Bryan L. Pellom, Joseph Polifroni, Alexandros Potamianos, P. Prabhu, Alexander I. Rudnicky, Gregory A. Sanders, Stephanie Seneff, David Stallard, Steve Whittaker 0001
INTERSPEECH5
2000 ATLAS: A Flexible and Extensible Architecture for Linguistic Annotation
Steven Bird, David Day, John S. Garofolo, John Henderson, Christophe Laprun, Mark Y. Liberman
LREC3
1999 NIST's 1998 topic detection and tracking evaluation (TDT2)
abstract
This paper presents a summary of the 1998 Topic Detection and Tracking (TDT) tasks and the results of the 1998 TDT evaluation. The purpose of TDT is to develop technologies for retrieval and automatic organization of Broadcast News and Newswire stories and to evaluate the performance of those technologies. The TDT project builds on and extends the technologies of Automatic Speech Recognition and Document Retrieval with three tasks: 1) Story Segmentation, 2) Topic Detection and 3) Topic Tracking. Each of the tasks simulates a hypothetical operational system that requires incoming data to be processed time synchronously. The 1998 TDT evaluation (TDT2) continues the work of the TDT pilot study conducted in 1997 (TDT1) and is the first open evaluation of TDT tasks.
Jon Fiscus, George R. Doddington, John S. Garofolo, Alvin F. Martin
EUROSPEECH3
1997 Use of broadcast news materials for speech recognition benchmark tests
abstract
This paper reports on the use of materials derived from radio For the 1996 tests, a detailed annotation convention was and television news broadcasts for research and testing implemented by the LDC to capture these effects. This purposes for large vocabulary Continuous Speech Recogniconvention permitted the community to implement a tion (CSR) technology. Tests using these materials have been particular form of partitioned evaluation, and for which implemented by NIST on behalf of the DARPA-funded NIST’s analyses of results could be partitioned into speech recognition research community in 1995 and 1996, corresponding categories. and are expected to continue for the next several years. Four research groups participated in the 1995 tests, and nine For all systems, perhaps most striking feature of these tests groups (at eight sites) participated in the 1996 tests. This is that from segment to segment the word error rates paper documents properties of the training and test materials, sometimes vary over a wide range. The challenge that is describes a detailed annotation and transcription protocol that presented by the broadcast materials is significant. In the has been used for more than 100 hours of recorded data that 1996 tests, involving both radio and TV broadcast news has been made available through the Linguistic Data Consormaterials, the system with the lowest measured error rate had tium (LDC), and discusses test protocols and results of both an overall word error rate of 27.1%. the 1995 and 1996 Benchmark Tests.
David S. Pallett, Jon Fiscus, William M. Fisher, John S. Garofolo
EUROSPEECH4
1994 The development of file formats for very large speech corpora: SPHERE and SHORTEN
abstract
The performance of large vocabulary speech recognition systems is currently thought to be limited by the size of the corpus used to train the recognition system. Hence several very large speech corpora have been created recently and many more are planned. A significant problem in the generation of these corpora is the definition of their format to minimize distribution costs and maximize ease of use. This paper describes the development of a "standard" lossless compressed waveform file format which minimizes the media required for corpora distribution while maximizing accessibility. This paper contains two primary contributions: 1) The use of a "standard" file format for speech corpora which supports embedded compression and the development of a software interface toolkit which supports automatic waveform compression/decompression; 2) The use of lossless data compression for speech corpora. This task differs from mainstream speech coding in that the compression must be fast and lossless. Fast approximations to the standard techniques of linear prediction and residual coding have been developed and are employed.>
John S. Garofolo, Tony Robinson, Jon Fiscus
ICASSP (1)1
1989 Use of CD-ROM for speech database storage and exchange
John S. Garofolo, David S. Pallett
EUROSPEECH1