Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hao-Lun Lee

dblp:91/886 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Legged, aerial and field robots · 61% Motion planning and robot control · 39%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
legged robot locomotion
0.011999
Increasing the Locomotive Stability Margin of Multilegged Vehicles · ICRA 1999
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
stability margin
0.011999
Increasing the Locomotive Stability Margin of Multilegged Vehicles · ICRA 1999
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › dynamic stability
walking stability
0.011999
Increasing the Locomotive Stability Margin of Multilegged Vehicles · ICRA 1999
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.011999
Increasing the Locomotive Stability Margin of Multilegged Vehicles · ICRA 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

y-sway · 0.0simulation · 0.0e-sway · 0.0center of gravity control · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 Increasing the Locomotive Stability Margin of Multilegged Vehicles
abstract
We propose to include the vehicle body sway motion into the motion planning of a quadruped's wave gaits such that its stability margin can be substantially increased. Two sway motions are proposed: Y-sway and E-sway. The Y-sway motion is simple, which drives the center of gravity (CG) of the vehicle to approach to the y-component of the geometric center of the contact points of the supporting legs. The E-sway motion drives CG to approach to the desired CG locus for considering equal energy stability levels. Both sway motions are reasonably easy to implement. Between them, the E-sway can achieve better stability margin. When sloped terrains are encountered, body tilt is also considered in the initialization phase to improve the stability margin. Simulation results show that the body sway motions and tilt consideration are not mutually exclusive. Therefore, we may combine both actions to further increase the stability margin.
Fan-Tien Cheng, Hao-Lun Lee, David E. Orin
ICRA2