Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shirley Fitzgerald

dblp:92/11047 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Accessibility and assistive technology · 56% Health and well-being technologies · 44%
Computer networks
1 paper
Edge and fog computing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Accessibility and assistive technology › assistive technology
assistive technology deployment
0.012001
Telerehabilitation: Expanding access to rehabilitation expertise · Proc. IEEE 2001
Health and well-being technologies › rehabilitation technology
telerehabilitation
0.012001
Telerehabilitation: Expanding access to rehabilitation expertise · Proc. IEEE 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wearable sensors · 0.1video conferencing · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Telerehabilitation: Expanding access to rehabilitation expertise
abstract
The potential of modern telecommunications and computing technologies as tools in the delivery and evaluation of assistive technology (AT) has been discussed and has been termed telerehabilitation. The problems of providing AT in rural areas parallels the delivery of health care to rural areas where the proportion of people with chronic illnesses is higher and the means to pay for them is reduced. Large distances mean long travel times, increasing costs associated with any service delivery, and consuming valuable time skilled professionals could be using to provide services elsewhere. The technology available for practising telerehabilitation is significant and expanding at a rapid rate. Currently, plain old telephone systems (POTS) and broad-band videoconferencing equipment, Internet and World Wide Web, and embedded processor systems are most widely available. These technologies continue to evolve as well as emerging technologies such as wearable sensors that will have telehabilitation applications. Issues of payment, safety liability, and licensure need to be resolved, as legislation lags the development of new technologies.
Rory A. Cooper, Shirley Fitzgerald, Michael L. Boninger, David M. Brienza, Nigel Shapcott, Rosemarie Cooper, Katherine Flood
Proc. IEEE2