Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Scott T. Kelley

dblp:92/2661 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
0000-0001-9547-4169ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics
RNA structure prediction
0.122000
Phylogenetically enhanced statistical tools for RNA structure prediction · Bioinform. 2000
A Phylogenetic Approach to RNA Structure Prediction · ISMB 1999
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics
phylogenetic comparative methods
0.011999
A Phylogenetic Approach to RNA Structure Prediction · ISMB 1999
Bioinformatics and computational biology
molecular evolution
0.012000
Phylogenetically enhanced statistical tools for RNA structure prediction · Bioinform. 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics
0.012000
Phylogenetically enhanced statistical tools for RNA structure prediction · Bioinform. 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mutual information · 0.0chi-squared test · 0.0HKY evolution model · 0.0phylogenetics · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Metabolic Reconstruction for Metagenomic Data and Its Application to the Human Microbiome
abstract
Microbial communities carry out the majority of the biochemical activity on the planet, and they play integral roles in processes including metabolism and immune homeostasis in the human microbiome. Shotgun sequencing of such communities' metagenomes provides information complementary to organismal abundances from taxonomic markers, but the resulting data typically comprise short reads from hundreds of different organisms and are at best challenging to assemble comparably to single-organism genomes. Here, we describe an alternative approach to infer the functional and metabolic potential of a microbial community metagenome. We determined the gene families and pathways present or absent within a community, as well as their relative abundances, directly from short sequence reads. We validated this methodology using a collection of synthetic metagenomes, recovering the presence and abundance both of large pathways and of small functional modules with high accuracy. We subsequently applied this method, HUMAnN, to the microbial communities of 649 metagenomes drawn from seven primary body sites on 102 individuals as part of the Human Microbiome Project (HMP). This provided a means to compare functional diversity and organismal ecology in the human microbiome, and we determined a core of 24 ubiquitously present modules. Core pathways were often implemented by different enzyme families within different body sites, and 168 functional modules and 196 metabolic pathways varied in metagenomic abundance specifically to one or more niches within the microbiome. These included glycosaminoglycan degradation in the gut, as well as phosphate and amino acid transport linked to host phenotype (vaginal pH) in the posterior fornix. An implementation of our methodology is available at http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/humann. This provides a means to accurately and efficiently characterize microbial metabolic pathways and functional modules directly from high-throughput sequencing reads, enabling the determination of community roles in the HMP cohort and in future metagenomic studies.
Sahar Abubucker, Nicola Segata, Johannes Goll, Alyxandria M. Schubert, Jacques Izard, Brandi L. Cantarel, Beltran Rodriguez-Mueller, Jeremy Zucker, Mathangi Thiagarajan, Bernard Henrissat, Owen White, Scott T. Kelley, Barbara A. Methé, Patrick D. Schloss, Dirk Gevers, Makedonka Mitreva, Curtis Huttenhower
PLoS Comput. Biol.12
2000 Phylogenetically enhanced statistical tools for RNA structure prediction
abstract
MOTIVATION: Methods that predict the structure of molecules by looking for statistical correlation have been quite effective. Unfortunately, these methods often disregard phylogenetic information in the sequences they analyze. Here, we present a number of statistics for RNA molecular-structure prediction. Besides common pair-wise comparisons, we consider a few reasonable statistics for base-triple predictions, and present an elaborate analysis of these methods. All these statistics incorporate phylogenetic relationships of the sequences in the analysis to varying degrees, and the different nature of these tests gives a wide choice of statistical tools for RNA structure prediction. RESULTS: Starting from statistics that incorporate phylogenetic information only as independent sequence evolution models for each position of a multiple alignment, and extending this idea to a joint evolution model of two positions, we enhance the usual purely statistical methods (e.g. methods based on the Mutual Information statistic) with the use of phylogenetic information available in the sequences. In particular, we present a joint model based on the HKY evolution model, and consequently a X(2) test of independence for two positions. A significant part of this work is devoted to some mathematical analysis of these methods. We tested these statistics on regions of 16S and 23S rRNA, and tRNA.
Viatcheslav R. Akmaev, Scott T. Kelley, Gary D. Stormo
Bioinform.2
1999 A Phylogenetic Approach to RNA Structure Prediction
Viatcheslav R. Akmaev, Scott T. Kelley, Gary D. Stormo
ISMB2