Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zoë Abrams

dblp:92/4043 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0004-8130-1688ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 2 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 62% Approximation and online algorithms · 22% Mathematical optimization · 16%
Computer networks
2 papers
Internet of things and sensor networks · 64% Edge and fog computing · 36%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Distributed systems · 80% Parallel and multicore computing · 20%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data models and query languages · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
auction design
0.112007
Optimal delivery of sponsored search advertisements subject to budget constraints · EC 2007
Mathematical optimization
linear programming
0.112007
Optimal delivery of sponsored search advertisements subject to budget constraints · EC 2007
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › auction design
sponsored search auction
0.112007
Optimal delivery of sponsored search advertisements subject to budget constraints · EC 2007
Edge and fog computing
task allocation
0.112006
Kinetically stable task assignment for networks of microservers · IPSN 2006
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › revenue maximization
budget-constrained buyers
0.112006
Revenue maximization when bidders have budgets · SODA 2006
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
revenue maximization
0.112006
Revenue maximization when bidders have budgets · SODA 2006
Data models and query languages › datalog › datalog query optimization
deductive database query optimization
0.112005
Diagnosis of asynchronous discrete event systems: datalog to the rescue! · PODS 2005
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
energy-efficient monitoring
0.012004
Set k-cover algorithms for energy efficient monitoring in wireless sensor networks · IPSN 2004
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network
0.012004
Set k-cover algorithms for energy efficient monitoring in wireless sensor networks · IPSN 2004
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.012004
Set k-cover algorithms for energy efficient monitoring in wireless sensor networks · IPSN 2004
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms › combinatorial approximation algorithms
set cover approximation
0.012004
Set k-cover algorithms for energy efficient monitoring in wireless sensor networks · IPSN 2004
Distributed systems
distributed coordination
0.012006
Kinetically stable task assignment for networks of microservers · IPSN 2006
Parallel and multicore computing › load balancing › dynamic load balancing
task migration
0.012006
Kinetically stable task assignment for networks of microservers · IPSN 2006
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
coverage and connectivity
0.012004
Set k-cover algorithms for energy efficient monitoring in wireless sensor networks · IPSN 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.2multicommodity flow · 0.1maximum matching · 0.1query-sub-query (QSQ) · 0.1datalog · 0.1randomized rounding · 0.1distributed greedy algorithm · 0.1centralized greedy algorithm · 0.1linear programming · 0.1forecasting · 0.1mechanism design · 0.1auction theory · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Diffusion Synthesizer for Efficient Multilingual Speech to Speech Translation
Nameer Hirschkind, Mahesh Kumar Nandwana, Joseph Liu 0001, Eloi du Bois, Dao Le, Nicolas Thiebaut, Colin Sinclair, Kyle Spence, Charles Shang, Zoë Abrams, Morgan McGuire
INTERSPEECH11
2007 Optimal delivery of sponsored search advertisements subject to budget constraints
abstract
We discuss an auction framework in which sponsored search advertisements are delivered in response to queries. In practice, the presence of bidder budgets can have a significant impact on the ad delivery process. We propose an approach based on linear programming which takes bidder budgets into account, and uses them in conjunction with forecasting of query frequencies, and pricing and ranking schemes, to optimize ad delivery. Simulations show significant improvements in revenue and efficiency.
Zoë Abrams, Ofer Mendelevitch, John A. Tomlin
EC1
2006 Greedy is Good: On Service Tree Placement for In-Network Stream Processing
abstract
This paper is concerned with reducing communication costs when executing distributed user tasks in a sensor network. We take a service-oriented abstraction of sensor networks, where a user task is composed of a set of data processing modules (called services) with dependencies. Communications in sensor networks consume significant energy and introduce uncertainty in data fidelity due to high bit error rate. These constraints are abstracted as costs on the communication graph. The goal is to place the services within the sensor network so that the communication cost in performing the task is minimized. In addition, since the lifetime of a node, the quality of network links, and the composition of the service graph may change over time, the quality of the placement must be maintained in the face of these dynamics. In this paper, we take a fresh look at what is generally considered a simple but poor performance approach for service placement, namely the greedy algorithm. We prove that a modified greedy algorithm is guaranteed to have cost at most 8 times the optimum placement. In fact, the guarantee is even stronger if there is a high degree of data reduction in the service graph. The advantage of the greedy placement strategy is that when there are local changes in the service graph or when a hosting node fails, the repair only affects the placement of services that depend on the changes. Simulations suggest that in practice the greedy algorithm finds a low cost placement. Furthermore, the cost of repairing a greedy placement decreases rapidly as a function of the proximity of the services to be aggregated.
Zoë Abrams, Jie Liu 0001
ICDCS1
2006 Kinetically stable task assignment for networks of microservers
abstract
This paper studies task assignment in a network of resource constrained computing platforms (called microservers). A task is an abstraction of a computational agent or data that is hosted by the microservers. For example, in an object tracking scenario, a task represents a mobile tracking agent, such as a vehicle location update computation, that runs on microservers, which can receive sensor data pertaining to the object of interest. Due to object motion, the microservers that can observe a particular object change over time and there is overhead involved in migrating tasks among microservers. Furthermore, communication, processing, or memory constraints, allow a microserver to only serve a limited number of objects at the same time. Our overall goal is to assign tasks to microservers so as to minimize the number of migrations, and thus be kinetically stable, while guaranteeing that as many tasks as possible are monitored at all times. When the task trajectories are known in advance, we show that this problem is NP-complete (even over just two time steps), has an integrality gap of at least 2, and can be solved optimally in polynomial time if we allow tasks to be assigned fractionally. When only probabilistic information about future movement of the tasks is known, we propose two algorithms: a multi-commodity flow based algorithm and a maximum matching algorithm. We use simulations to compare the performance of these algorithms against the optimum task allocation strategy.
Zoë Abrams, Ho-Lin Chen, Leonidas J. Guibas, Jie Liu 0001, Feng Zhao 0001
IPSN1
2006 Revenue maximization when bidders have budgets
Zoë Abrams
SODA1
2005 Diagnosis of asynchronous discrete event systems: datalog to the rescue!
abstract
We consider query optimization techniques for data intensive P2P applications. We show how to adapt an old technique from deductive databases, namely Query-Sub-Query (QSQ), to a setting where autonomous and distributed peers share large volumes of interelated data.We illustrate the technique with an important telecommunication problem, the diagnosis of distributed telecom systems. We show that (i) the problem can be modeled using Datalog programs, and (ii) it can benefit from the large battery of optimization techniques developed for Datalog. In particular, we show that a simple generic use of the extension of QSQ achieves an optimization as good as that previously provided by dedicated diagnosis algorithms. Furthermore, we show that it allows solving efficiently a much larger class of system analysis problems.
Serge Abiteboul, Zoë Abrams, Stefan Haar, Tova Milo
PODS2
2004 Set k-cover algorithms for energy efficient monitoring in wireless sensor networks
abstract
Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are emerging as an effective means for environment monitoring. This paper investigates a strategy for energy efficient monitoring in WSNs that partitions the sensors into covers, and then activates the covers iteratively in a round-robin fashion. This approach takes advantage of the overlap created when many sensors monitor a single area. Our work builds upon previous work in [13], where the model is first formulated. We have designed three approximation algorithms for a variation of the SET K-COVER problem, where the objective is to partition the sensors into covers such that the number of covers that include an area, summed over all areas, is maximized. The first algorithm is randomized and partitions the sensors, in expectation, within a fraction 1-1 e (~.63) of the optimum. We present two other deterministic approximation algorithms. One is a distributed greedy algorithm with a 1 2 approximation ratio and the other is a centralized greedy algorithm with a 1-1 e approximation ratio. We show that it is NP-Complete to guarantee better than 15 16 of the optimal coverage, indicating that all three algorithms perform well with respect to the best approximation algorithm possible in polynomial time, assuming P ≠ NP. Simulations indicate that in practice, the deterministic algorithms perform far above their worst case bounds, consistently covering more than 72% of what is covered by an optimum solution. Simulations also indicate that the increase in longevity is proportional to the amount of overlap amongst the sensors. The algorithms are fast, easy to use, and according to simulations, significantly increase the longevity of sensor networks. The randomized algorithm in particular seems quite practical.
Zoë Abrams, Ashish Goel, Serge A. Plotkin
IPSN1