Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kin-Keung Ma
dblp:92/4060
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Program analysis · 73% Software testing · 18% Empirical software engineering · 6% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program analysis
configuration analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Using symbolic evaluation to understand behavior in configurable software systems · ICSE (1) 2010 |
Software testing › test coverage
coverage analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Using symbolic evaluation to understand behavior in configurable software systems · ICSE (1) 2010 |
Program analysis
symbolic execution |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Using symbolic evaluation to understand behavior in configurable software systems · ICSE (1) 2010 |
Program analysis › static analysis › pointer analysis
ownership inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Inferring aliasing and encapsulation properties for java · OOPSLA 2007 |
Program analysis › static analysis
pointer analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Inferring aliasing and encapsulation properties for java · OOPSLA 2007 |
Program analysis
static analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Inferring aliasing and encapsulation properties for java · OOPSLA 2007 |
Empirical software engineering › software engineering research methodology
empirical study |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Using symbolic evaluation to understand behavior in configurable software systems · ICSE (1) 2010 |
Programming languages and type systems
object-oriented programming |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Inferring aliasing and encapsulation properties for java · OOPSLA 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
symbolic evaluation · 0.1coverage analysis · 0.1intraprocedural points-to analysis · 0.1interprocedural demand-driven predicate resolution · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Directed Symbolic Execution
Kin-Keung Ma, Yit Phang Khoo, Jeffrey S. Foster, Michael Hicks 0001 |
SAS | 1 |
| 2010 | Using symbolic evaluation to understand behavior in configurable software systemsabstractMany modern software systems are designed to be highly configurable, which increases flexibility but can make programs hard to test, analyze, and understand. We present an initial empirical study of how configuration options affect program behavior. We conjecture that, at certain levels of abstraction, configuration spaces are far smaller than the worst case, in which every configuration is distinct. We evaluated our conjecture by studying three configurable software systems: vsftpd, ngIRCd, and grep. We used symbolic evaluation to discover how the settings of run-time configuration options affect line, basic block, edge, and condition coverage for our subjects under a given test suite. Our results strongly suggest that for these subject programs, test suites, and configuration options, when abstracted in terms of the four coverage criteria above, configuration spaces are in fact much smaller than combinatorics would suggest and are effectively the composition of many small, self-contained groupings of options. Elnatan Reisner, Charles Song, Kin-Keung Ma, Jeffrey S. Foster, Adam A. Porter |
ICSE (1) | 3 |
| 2007 | Inferring aliasing and encapsulation properties for javaabstractThere are many proposals for language techniques to control aliasing and encapsulation in object oriented programs, typically based on notions of object ownership and pointer uniqueness. Most of these systems require extensive manual annotations, and thus there is little experience with these properties in large, existing Java code bases. To remedy this situation, we present Uno, a novel static analysis for automatically inferring ownership, uniqueness, and other aliasing and encapsulation properties in Java. Our analysis requires no annotations, and combines an intraprocedural points-to analysis with an interprocedural, demand-driven predicate resolution algorithm. We have applied Uno to a variety of Java applications and found that some aliasing properties, such as temporarily lending a reference to a method, are common, while others, in particular field and argument ownership, are relatively uncommon. As a result, we believe that Uno can be a valuable tool for discovering and understanding aliasing and encapsulation in Java programs. Kin-Keung Ma, Jeffrey S. Foster |
OOPSLA | 1 |