Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jason Spiegel

dblp:92/9543 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
computer-mediated communication
0.112011
Upset now?: emotion contagion in distributed groups · CHI 2011
Collaborative and social computing › computer-mediated communication
emotional contagion
0.112011
Upset now?: emotion contagion in distributed groups · CHI 2011
Collaborative and social computing › remote collaboration
distributed groups
0.012011
Upset now?: emotion contagion in distributed groups · CHI 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

emotion induction · 0.1controlled experiment · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Upset now?: emotion contagion in distributed groups
abstract
The importance of emotion to group outcomes in FtF highlights the need to understand emotion contagion in distributed groups. The present study examines the transfer of negative emotion in online groups. Negative emotion was induced in one of three group members completing a task in CMC. The data suggest that emotion contagion took place at the group level, with partners experiencing more negative emotion, more disagreement, higher verbosity, and use of more complex language in induced groups compared to control groups. Induced groups also performed better on the group task, raising questions about the effects of negative emotion contagion in online groups.
Jamie Guillory, Jason Spiegel, Molly Drislane, Benjamin Weiss 0005, Walter Donner, Jeffrey T. Hancock
CHI2