Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paul Over

dblp:93/2644 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0001-7436-5254ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 8 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Information retrieval · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › near-duplicate detection
video copy detection
0.212014
Content-Based Video Copy Detection Benchmarking at TRECVID · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2014
Information retrieval › interactive information retrieval › search interaction
interactive video search
0.112010
Video search: are algorithms all we need? · WWW 2010
Information retrieval › multimedia analysis and retrieval
video search
0.112010
Video search: are algorithms all we need? · WWW 2010
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › video retrieval
interactive video search
0.012004
TRECVID: evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval tasks on digital video · ACM Multimedia 2004
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
shot boundary detection
0.012004
TRECVID: evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval tasks on digital video · ACM Multimedia 2004
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
video retrieval
0.012004
TRECVID: evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval tasks on digital video · ACM Multimedia 2004
Information retrieval
multimedia analysis and retrieval
0.012010
Video search: are algorithms all we need? · WWW 2010
Information retrieval › multimedia analysis and retrieval
video retrieval
0.012010
Video search: are algorithms all we need? · WWW 2010
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.011998
Comparing Interactive Information Retrieval systems Across Sites: The TREC-6 Interactive Track Matrix Experiment · SIGIR 1998
Information retrieval
interactive information retrieval
0.011998
Comparing Interactive Information Retrieval systems Across Sites: The TREC-6 Interactive Track Matrix Experiment · SIGIR 1998
Information retrieval
search engines
0.011998
Tools for Searching the Web (panel) · SIGIR 1998
Information retrieval
web search
0.011998
Tools for Searching the Web (panel) · SIGIR 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

normalized detection cost framework · 0.2search algorithm · 0.1crowdsourced metadata · 0.1evaluation · 0.0benchmarking · 0.0TREC interactive track · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Content-Based Video Copy Detection Benchmarking at TRECVID
abstract
This article presents an overview of the video copy detection benchmark which was run over a period of 4 years (2008--2011) as part of the TREC Video Retrieval (TRECVID) workshop series. The main contributions of the article include i) an examination of the evolving design of the evaluation framework and its components (system tasks, data, measures); ii) a high-level overview of results and best-performing approaches; and iii) a discussion of lessons learned over the four years. The content-based copy detection (CCD) benchmark worked with a large collection of synthetic queries, which is atypical for TRECVID, as was the use of a normalized detection cost framework. These particular evaluation design choices are motivated and appraised.
George Awad, Paul Over, Wessel Kraaij
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.2
2012 Creating HAVIC: Heterogeneous Audio Visual Internet Collection
Stephanie M. Strassel, Amanda Morris, Jon Fiscus, Christopher Caruso, Haejoong Lee, Paul Over, James Fiumara, Barbara Shaw, Brian Antonishek, Martial Michel
LREC6
2010 Video search: are algorithms all we need?
abstract
This panel will debate various approaches to improving video search, and explore how professional cataloguing, crowd sourced metadata, and improvements in search algorithms will evolve over the next ten years. Panelists will explore the needs of large scale video archives, and compare these against the current capabilities of video search.
Jeff Ubois, Jamie Davidson, Marko Grobelnik, Paul Over, Hans Westerhof
WWW4
2010 Video shot boundary detection: Seven years of TRECVid activity
Alan F. Smeaton, Paul Over, Aiden R. Doherty
Comput. Vis. Image Underst.2
2009 The TRECVid 2008 Event Detection evaluation
abstract
This paper is a summary of the 2008 TRECVid Event Detection evaluation track. TRECVid is a laboratory-style evaluation that aims to model real world situations or significant component tasks. The event detection evaluation was organized to address detection of a set of specific events that would be of potential interest to an operator in the surveillance domain. This paper describes the video data, evaluation tasks, evaluation metrics, and results of the event detection evaluation.
R. Travis Rose, Jon Fiscus, Paul Over, John S. Garofolo, Martial Michel
WACV3
2007 DUC in context
Paul Over, Hoa Dang, Donna K. Harman
Inf. Process. Manag.1
2004 TRECVID: evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval tasks on digital video
abstract
TRECVID is an annual exercise which encourages research in information retrieval from digital video by providing a large video test collection, uniform scoring procedures, and a forum for organizations interested in comparing their results. TRECVID benchmarking covers both interactive and manual searching by end users, as well as the benchmarking of some supporting technologies including shot boundary detection, extraction of some semantic features, and the automatic segmentation of TV news broadcasts into non-overlapping news stories. TRECVID has a broad range of over 40 participating groups from across the world and as it is now (2004) in its 4th annual cycle it is opportune to stand back and look at the lessons we have learned from the cumulative activity. In this paper we shall present a brief and high-level overview of the TRECVID activity covering the data, the benchmarked tasks, the overall results obtained by groups to date and an overview of the approaches taken by selective groups in some tasks. While progress from one year to the next cannot be measured directly because of the changing nature of the video data we have been using, we shall present a summary of the lessons we have learned from TRECVID and include some pointers on what we feel are the most important of these lessons.
Alan F. Smeaton, Paul Over, Wessel Kraaij
ACM Multimedia2
2001 Interactivity at the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC)
William R. Hersh, Paul Over
Inf. Process. Manag.2
2001 The TREC interactive track: an annotated bibliography
Paul Over
Inf. Process. Manag.1
1999 Blind Men and Elephants: Six Approaches to TREC Data
David Banks, Paul Over, Nien-Fan Zhang
Inf. Retr.2
1998 Tools for Searching the Web (panel)
abstract
No abstract available.
Donna K. Harman, Paul Over
SIGIR2
1998 Comparing Interactive Information Retrieval systems Across Sites: The TREC-6 Interactive Track Matrix Experiment
abstract
Article Free Access Share on Comparing interactive information retrieval systems across sites: the TREC-6 interactive track matrix experiment Authors: Eric Lagergren Statistical Engineering Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD Statistical Engineering Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MDView Profile , Paul Over Information Access and User Interfaces Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD Information Access and User Interfaces Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MDView Profile Authors Info & Claims SIGIR '98: Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrievalAugust 1998 Pages 164–172https://doi.org/10.1145/290941.290986Online:01 August 1998Publication History 43citation637DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations43Total Downloads637Last 12 Months10Last 6 weeks3 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteeReaderPDF
Eric Lagergren, Paul Over
SIGIR2