Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thomas Barthel
dblp:93/4351
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-5351-4011ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 30% Efficient and distributed learning · 30% Optimization for machine learning · 30% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
low-rank constraint |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Machine Learning With Tree Tensor Networks, CP Rank Constraints, and Tensor Dropout · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Machine Learning With Tree Tensor Networks, CP Rank Constraints, and Tensor Dropout · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Machine Learning With Tree Tensor Networks, CP Rank Constraints, and Tensor Dropout · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tree tensor networks · 0.8tensor dropout · 0.8CP rank constraints · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Machine Learning With Tree Tensor Networks, CP Rank Constraints, and Tensor DropoutabstractTensor networks developed in the context of condensed matter physics try to approximate order- N tensors with a reduced number of degrees of freedom that is only polynomial in N and arranged as a network of partially contracted smaller tensors. As we have recently demonstrated in the context of quantum many-body physics, computation costs can be further substantially reduced by imposing constraints on the canonical polyadic (CP) rank of the tensors in such networks. Here, we demonstrate how tree tensor networks (TTN) with CP rank constraints and tensor dropout can be used in machine learning. The approach is found to outperform other tensor-network-based methods in Fashion-MNIST image classification. A low-rank TTN classifier with branching ratio b=4 reaches a test set accuracy of 90.3% with low computation costs. Consisting of mostly linear elements, tensor network classifiers avoid the vanishing gradient problem of deep neural networks. The CP rank constraints have additional advantages: The number of parameters can be decreased and tuned more freely to control overfitting, improve generalization properties, and reduce computation costs. They allow us to employ trees with large branching ratios, substantially improving the representation power. Hao Chen 0132, Thomas Barthel |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |