Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thomas Barthel

dblp:93/4351 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-5351-4011ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 30% Efficient and distributed learning · 30% Optimization for machine learning · 30%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
low-rank constraint
0.812024
Machine Learning With Tree Tensor Networks, CP Rank Constraints, and Tensor Dropout · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.812024
Machine Learning With Tree Tensor Networks, CP Rank Constraints, and Tensor Dropout · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.212024
Machine Learning With Tree Tensor Networks, CP Rank Constraints, and Tensor Dropout · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tree tensor networks · 0.8tensor dropout · 0.8CP rank constraints · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Machine Learning With Tree Tensor Networks, CP Rank Constraints, and Tensor Dropout
abstract
Tensor networks developed in the context of condensed matter physics try to approximate order- N tensors with a reduced number of degrees of freedom that is only polynomial in N and arranged as a network of partially contracted smaller tensors. As we have recently demonstrated in the context of quantum many-body physics, computation costs can be further substantially reduced by imposing constraints on the canonical polyadic (CP) rank of the tensors in such networks. Here, we demonstrate how tree tensor networks (TTN) with CP rank constraints and tensor dropout can be used in machine learning. The approach is found to outperform other tensor-network-based methods in Fashion-MNIST image classification. A low-rank TTN classifier with branching ratio b=4 reaches a test set accuracy of 90.3% with low computation costs. Consisting of mostly linear elements, tensor network classifiers avoid the vanishing gradient problem of deep neural networks. The CP rank constraints have additional advantages: The number of parameters can be decreased and tuned more freely to control overfitting, improve generalization properties, and reduce computation costs. They allow us to employ trees with large branching ratios, substantially improving the representation power.
Hao Chen 0132, Thomas Barthel
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2