Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Nancy Cunniff

dblp:94/2431 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computing education › programming education
novice programming		 0.011986
Does programming language affect the type of conceptual bugs in beginners' programs? A comparison of FPL and Pascal · CHI 1986
Programming languages and type systems
language comparison		 0.011986
Does programming language affect the type of conceptual bugs in beginners' programs? A comparison of FPL and Pascal · CHI 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

comparative study · 0.0bug taxonomy · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1986 Does programming language affect the type of conceptual bugs in beginners' programs? A comparison of FPL and Pascal
abstract
The effect of the graphical programming language FPL (First Programming Language) on the occurrence of conceptual bugs in programs written by novices was studied. The type and location for each bug, and the frequency for each type were all recorded following procedures developed in an earlier Yale University study of novice Pascal programming. The findings were compared with those of the earlier study, and suggest that FPL may help beginning programmers avoid some common conceptual errors in their programming.
Nancy Cunniff, Robert P. Taylor, John B. Black
 CHI1