Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

C. J. Clark

dblp:94/2435 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 4 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 50% Motion planning and robot control · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › cooperative manipulation
cooperative robot control
0.011986
A comparison of control laws for a cooperative robot system · ICRA 1986
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › compliant motion control
hybrid position/force control
0.011986
A comparison of control laws for a cooperative robot system · ICRA 1986
Robotics › Robot manipulation
dual-arm manipulation
0.011986
A comparison of control laws for a cooperative robot system · ICRA 1986
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › teleoperation
master-slave control
0.011986
A comparison of control laws for a cooperative robot system · ICRA 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

low-pass prefilter · 0.0band-pass cross filter · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Hot topic session 12B: Stay relevant with standards-based DFT
abstract
IEEE 1149.1-2013 provides compatible IEEE 1500 Wrapper Serial Port access for on-chip DFT and instrumentation access. This presentation shows how IEEE 1149.1-2013 integrates with IEEE 1500 WSPs and adds new capabilities such as wrapper segmentation for low power designs. Example architectures are presented with BSDL descriptions of IEEE 1500 WIRs and wrappers.
C. J. Clark, Víctor H. Champac
VTS1
2010 Solutions for undetected shorts on IEEE 1149.1 self-monitoring pins
abstract
This paper presents the problem of undetected shorts on IEEE 1149.1 compliant self-monitoring pins. Unidirectional and bidirectional self-monitoring pins may contain sufficient series termination resistance and low enough voltage swings such that shorts between two pins become resistively isolated from the receivers and therefore are undetected during wiring interconnect tests. Potential solutions to mitigate the problem are offered.
C. J. Clark, Dave Dubberke, Kenneth P. Parker, Bill Tuthill
ITC1
2004 A Code-less BIST Processor for Embedded Test and in-system configuration of Boards and Systems
abstract
A code-less processor that enables designers to achieve optimal in-system FPGA configuration as well as embed built-in self-test capabilities into boards and systems is presented. This system BIST architecture enables designers to lower system costs and design effort while satisfying test and field engineering requirements for simplified product test. The BIST processor described here provides a structured approach to solve these problems, using infrastructure IP designed for the board and system levels.
C. J. Clark, Mike Ricchetti
ITC1
2002 Reducing Time to Volume and Time to Market: Is Silicon Debug and Diagnosis the Answer?
abstract
Advances in semiconductor technology and design automation, together with increased market competition, have driven engineers to achieve higher levels of integration, with shortened development cycles. Consequently, verification and analysis are becoming a major bottleneck for timely design of complex systems. The panelists and the audience will explore silicon debug and its impact on the design cycle.
Fidel Muradali, Mike Ricchetti, Bart Vermeulen, Bulent I. Dervisoglu, Bob Gottlieb, Bernd Koenemann, C. J. Clark
VTS7
1986 A comparison of control laws for a cooperative robot system
abstract
A two armed master-slave robot was modeled; simulations were run with a variety of compensation schemes using a payload with a compressive spring of 10,000 N/m and a preload force of 25 N against the payload. The slave arm was at first controlled by a simple linear force controller; this was inadequate with position step commands in that the force response oscillated greatly and resulted in crushing or dropping the payload. A low pass prefilter in the position command path corrected this, but so slowed the position response that significant tasks could not be carried out. These results illustrate the two way physical linkage between position output and force regulation dynamics. A second order, band pass cross filter sending position command as input into the forward loop of the force controller, enabled adequate position control dynamics and kept the payload force excursions to a minimum.
C. J. Clark, L. Stark
ICRA1