Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Filippo Poggi

dblp:94/3548 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.112006
Using a calibration experiment to assess gene-specific information: full Bayesian and empirical Bayesian models for two-channel microarray data · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis
0.012006
Using a calibration experiment to assess gene-specific information: full Bayesian and empirical Bayesian models for two-channel microarray data · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.012006
Using a calibration experiment to assess gene-specific information: full Bayesian and empirical Bayesian models for two-channel microarray data · Bioinform. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

winbugs · 0.1hierarchical bayesian model · 0.1empirical bayes · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Using a calibration experiment to assess gene-specific information: full Bayesian and empirical Bayesian models for two-channel microarray data
abstract
MOTIVATION: Microarray studies permit to quantify expression levels on a global scale by measuring transcript abundance of thousands of genes simultaneously. A difficulty when analysing expression measures is how to model variability for the whole set of genes. It is usually unrealistic to assume a common variance for each gene. Several approaches to model gene-specific variances are proposed. We take advantage of calibration experiments, in which the probes hybridized on the two channels come from the same population (self-self experiment). In this case it is possible to estimate the gene-specific variance, to be incorporated in comparative experiments on the same tissue, cellular line or species. RESULTS: We present two approaches to introduce prior information on gene-specific variability from a calibration experiment: an empirical Bayes model and a full Bayesian hierarchical model. We apply the methods in the analysis of human lipopolysaccharide-stimulated leukocyte experiments. AVAILABILITY: The calculations are implemented in WinBugs. The codes are available on request from the authors.
Marta Blangiardo, Simona Toti, Betti Giusti, Rosanna Abbate, Alberto Magi, Filippo Poggi, Luciana Rossi, Francesca Torricelli, Annibale Biggeri
Bioinform.6