Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brammert Ottens

dblp:94/3599 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0003-1236-6029ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Multi-agent systems · 38% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 38% Reinforcement learning · 23%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
distributed constraint optimization
0.112012
DUCT: An Upper Confidence Bound Approach to Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems · AAAI 2012
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › qualitative reasoning
qualitative spatial reasoning
0.112007
The Mathematical Morpho-Logical View on Reasoning about Space · IJCAI 2007
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning
0.112007
The Mathematical Morpho-Logical View on Reasoning about Space · IJCAI 2007
Logic in computer science › knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning
0.112007
The Mathematical Morpho-Logical View on Reasoning about Space · IJCAI 2007
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit
0.012012
DUCT: An Upper Confidence Bound Approach to Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems · AAAI 2012
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
upper confidence bound
0.012012
DUCT: An Upper Confidence Bound Approach to Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems · AAAI 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

upper confidence tree · 0.1upper confidence bound · 0.1mathematical morphology · 0.1distributed search · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 DUCT: An Upper Confidence Bound Approach to Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems
abstract
We propose a distributed upper confidence bound approach, DUCT, for solving distributed constraint optimization problems. We compare four variants of this approach with a baseline random sampling algorithm, as well as other complete and incomplete algorithms for DCOPs. Under general assumptions, we theoretically show that the solution found by DUCT after T steps is approximately T −1 -close to the optimal. Experimentally, we show that DUCT matches the optimal solution found by the well-known DPOP and O-DPOP algorithms on moderate-size problems, while always requiring less agent communication. For larger problems, where DPOP fails, we show that DUCT produces significantly better solutions than local, incomplete algorithms. Overall, we believe that DUCT is a practical, scalable algorithm for complex DCOPs.
Brammert Ottens, Christos Dimitrakakis, Boi Faltings
ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol.1
2012 DUCT: An Upper Confidence Bound Approach to Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems
abstract
The Upper Confidence Bounds (UCB) algorithm is a well-known near-optimal strategy for the stochastic multi-armed bandit problem. Its extensions to trees, such as the Upper Confidence Tree (UCT) algorithm, have resulted in good solutions to the problem of Go. This paper introduces DUCT, a distributed algorithm inspired by UCT, for solving Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems (DCOP). Bounds on the solution quality are provided, and experiments show that, compared to existing DCOP approaches, DUCT is able to solve very large problems much more efficiently, or to find significantly higher quality solutions.
Brammert Ottens, Christos Dimitrakakis, Boi Faltings
AAAI1
2007 The Mathematical Morpho-Logical View on Reasoning about Space
Marco Aiello 0001, Brammert Ottens
IJCAI2