Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gery Colombo

dblp:94/4162 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot manipulation · 50% Motion planning and robot control · 43% Legged, aerial and field robots · 6%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Health and well-being technologies · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › medical robotics
rehabilitation robotics
0.122006
ARMin - Robot for Rehabilitation of the Upper Extremities · ICRA 2006
Automatic gait-pattern adaptation algorithms for rehabilitation with a 4-DOF robotic orthosis · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2004
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › locomotion control
gait adaptation
0.012004
Automatic gait-pattern adaptation algorithms for rehabilitation with a 4-DOF robotic orthosis · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2004
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
impedance control
0.012004
Automatic gait-pattern adaptation algorithms for rehabilitation with a 4-DOF robotic orthosis · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2004
Health and well-being technologies
rehabilitation
0.012006
ARMin - Robot for Rehabilitation of the Upper Extremities · ICRA 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

impedance control · 0.2admittance control · 0.1online minimization · 0.0inverse dynamics · 0.0direct dynamics · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 ARMin - Robot for Rehabilitation of the Upper Extremities
abstract
Task-oriented repetitive movements can improve motor recovery in patients with neurological or orthopaedic lesions. The application of robotics can serve to assist, enhance, evaluate, and document neurological and orthopaedic rehabilitation. ARMin is a new robot for arm therapy applicable to the training of activities of daily living in clinics. ARMin has a semiexoskeletal structure with six degrees of freedom, and is equipped with position and force sensors. The mechanical structure, the actuators and the sensors of the robot are optimized for patient-cooperative control strategies based on impedance and admittance architectures. This paper describes the mechanical structure, the control system, the sensors and actuators, safety aspects and results of a first pilot study with hemiplegic and spinal cord injured subjects
Tobias Nef, Matjaz Mihelj, Gery Colombo, Robert Riener
ICRA3
2004 Automatic gait-pattern adaptation algorithms for rehabilitation with a 4-DOF robotic orthosis
abstract
This paper presents newly developed algorithms for automatic adaptation of motion for a robotic rehabilitation device. The algorithms adapt the gait pattern of patients that walk on a treadmill. Three different algorithms were developed. The first one is based on inverse dynamics and online minimization of the human-machine interaction torque. The second one is based on direct dynamics and estimation of the desired variation in the gait-pattern acceleration. The third algorithm is based on impedance control and direct adaptation of the gait pattern angular trajectories. The algorithms were tested and compared in computer simulations and actual experiments on healthy subjects and patients. In simulations, all algorithms have adapted the gait pattern toward the desired one, which led to a greater than 40% reduction of interaction torques. The impedance-control-based algorithm performed best in the experiments.
Saso Jezernik, Gery Colombo, Manfred Morari
IEEE Trans. Robotics2