Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gerry B. Andeen
dblp:94/5260
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Robot manipulation · 70% Motion planning and robot control · 30% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation
compliant manipulation |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Specifying and achieving passive compliance based on manipulator structure · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1995 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › compliant manipulation
passive compliance |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Specifying and achieving passive compliance based on manipulator structure · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1995 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
compliant motion control |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Design of compliance in robots · ICRA 1988 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
force control |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Design of compliance in robots · ICRA 1988 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
robot design |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Design of compliance in robots · ICRA 1988 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › impedance control
stiffness control |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Specifying and achieving passive compliance based on manipulator structure · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1995 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › actuator design
variable stiffness |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Specifying and achieving passive compliance based on manipulator structure · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1995 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › vibration suppression
vibration damping |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Design of compliance in robots · ICRA 1988 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stiffness matrix design · 0.0nonlinear control · 0.0flexible limb design · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | Specifying and achieving passive compliance based on manipulator structureabstractWe explore the possibility of achieving passive compliance through the structure of the manipulator itself. The emphasis is on passive compliance because a minimum of passive compliance to prevent jamming will always be required even when active stiffness control is employed. Particular attention is given to the large class of robots with nonbackdrivable actuators, where the actuator must be commanded to move, and in which actuator forces or torques are not easily interpreted as end-effector forces and torques. We present a novel framework for specifying the desired end-effector compliance for several tasks in terms of stiffness matrices. We explore whether the desired stiffness matrix of a manipulator can be achieved by using the natural or designed stiffness of the manipulator limbs themselves. Several techniques for adjusting the manipulator stiffness matrix are proposed. Achieving this variable passive compliance allows the attainment of high stiffnesses for fast and accurate movements and low stiffness values for force control. Furthermore, achieving nondiagonal stiffness properties wherein there are force and motion coupling in different directions is shown to be useful to prevent jamming and contact induced vibrations.> Marcelo H. Ang, Gerry B. Andeen |
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. | 2 |
| 1988 | Design of compliance in robotsabstractBecause today's manipulators are generally limited to position-control functions and burdened by the excessive mass implicit in their machine-tool design assumptions, a novel design is proposed to overcome these limitations and lead to lighter, faster, and more useful robots. An elbow-manipulator design with highly geared motors is suggested in which the forelimb is made flexible in one plane, and is light in comparison to the loads. The compliant limb is located between kinematically redundant joints that can rotate the limb, thereby adjusting the manipulator end-point compliance. Nonlinear techniques can be used to augment vibration damping. Such a manipulator can carry out force-control and low-compliance tasks as well as conventional position-controlled functions.> Gerry B. Andeen, Roy Kornbluh |
ICRA | 1 |