Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gerry B. Andeen

dblp:94/5260 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot manipulation · 70% Motion planning and robot control · 30%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
compliant manipulation
0.011995
Specifying and achieving passive compliance based on manipulator structure · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1995
Robotics › Robot manipulation › compliant manipulation
passive compliance
0.011995
Specifying and achieving passive compliance based on manipulator structure · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1995
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
compliant motion control
0.011988
Design of compliance in robots · ICRA 1988
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
force control
0.011988
Design of compliance in robots · ICRA 1988
Robotics › Robot manipulation
robot design
0.011988
Design of compliance in robots · ICRA 1988
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › impedance control
stiffness control
0.011995
Specifying and achieving passive compliance based on manipulator structure · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1995
Robotics › Robot manipulation › actuator design
variable stiffness
0.011995
Specifying and achieving passive compliance based on manipulator structure · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1995
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › vibration suppression
vibration damping
0.011988
Design of compliance in robots · ICRA 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stiffness matrix design · 0.0nonlinear control · 0.0flexible limb design · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Specifying and achieving passive compliance based on manipulator structure
abstract
We explore the possibility of achieving passive compliance through the structure of the manipulator itself. The emphasis is on passive compliance because a minimum of passive compliance to prevent jamming will always be required even when active stiffness control is employed. Particular attention is given to the large class of robots with nonbackdrivable actuators, where the actuator must be commanded to move, and in which actuator forces or torques are not easily interpreted as end-effector forces and torques. We present a novel framework for specifying the desired end-effector compliance for several tasks in terms of stiffness matrices. We explore whether the desired stiffness matrix of a manipulator can be achieved by using the natural or designed stiffness of the manipulator limbs themselves. Several techniques for adjusting the manipulator stiffness matrix are proposed. Achieving this variable passive compliance allows the attainment of high stiffnesses for fast and accurate movements and low stiffness values for force control. Furthermore, achieving nondiagonal stiffness properties wherein there are force and motion coupling in different directions is shown to be useful to prevent jamming and contact induced vibrations.>
Marcelo H. Ang, Gerry B. Andeen
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom.2
1988 Design of compliance in robots
abstract
Because today's manipulators are generally limited to position-control functions and burdened by the excessive mass implicit in their machine-tool design assumptions, a novel design is proposed to overcome these limitations and lead to lighter, faster, and more useful robots. An elbow-manipulator design with highly geared motors is suggested in which the forelimb is made flexible in one plane, and is light in comparison to the loads. The compliant limb is located between kinematically redundant joints that can rotate the limb, thereby adjusting the manipulator end-point compliance. Nonlinear techniques can be used to augment vibration damping. Such a manipulator can carry out force-control and low-compliance tasks as well as conventional position-controlled functions.>
Gerry B. Andeen, Roy Kornbluh
ICRA1