Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Darcy Warkentin
dblp:95/7848
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative and social computing
computer-mediated communication |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Warrants and deception in computer mediated communication · CSCW 2010 |
Collaborative and social computing › computer-mediated communication
deception |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Warrants and deception in computer mediated communication · CSCW 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
survey · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Warrants and deception in computer mediated communicationabstractThis article explores the operation of warrants, connections between online and real-world identities, on deceptive behavior in computer-mediated communication. A survey of 132 participants assessed three types of warrants (the use of a real name, a photo, and the presence of real-world acquaintances) in five different media: IM, Forums, Chat, Social Networking Sites (SNS) and Email. The effect of warrants on lies about demographic information (e.g., age, gender, education, etc.), one's interests (e.g., religion, music preferences, etc.), and the seriousness of lies was assessed. Overall, deception was observed most frequently in Chat and least often in SNS and Email. The relationship between warrants and deception was negative and linear, with warrants suppressing the frequency and seriousness of deception regardless of medium, although real-world acquaintances were especially powerful in constraining deception in SNS and emails. Darcy Warkentin, Michael Woodworth, Jeffrey T. Hancock, Nicole Cormier |
CSCW | 1 |