Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tomoharu Sano

dblp:95/9255 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Wearable and physiological sensing · 77% Design research and methods · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wearable and physiological sensing
facial expression sensing
0.112011
From cartoons to robots part 2: facial regions as cues to recognize emotions · HRI 2011
Design research and methods › research methodology
cross-cultural study
0.012011
From cartoons to robots part 2: facial regions as cues to recognize emotions · HRI 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 From cartoons to robots part 2: facial regions as cues to recognize emotions
abstract
This paper reports a preliminary result of a cross-cultural study on the facial regions as cues to recognize virtual agents' facial expressions. We believe providing research results on the perception of cartoonish virtual agents' facial expressions to HRI research community is meaningful in order to minimize the effort to develop robot's facial expressions. The result implies Japanese weighed facial cues more heavily in the eye regions than Hungarians, who weighed facial cues more heavily in the mouth region than Japanese.
Tomoko Koda, Zsófia Ruttkay, Tomoharu Sano
HRI3