Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Electra Sutton
dblp:96/1218
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene co-expression analysis
gene expression network analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Differential network expression during drug and stress response · Bioinform. 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gene expression data integration · 0.1biological network construction · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Applying Digital Library Technologies to Nuclear Forensics
Electra Sutton, Chloe Reynolds, Fredric C. Gey, Ray R. Larson |
TPDL | 1 |
| 2005 | Differential network expression during drug and stress responseabstractMOTIVATION: The application of microarray chip technology has led to an explosion of data concerning the expression levels of the genes in an organism under a plethora of conditions. One of the major challenges of systems biology today is to devise generally applicable methods of interpreting this data in a way that will shed light on the complex relationships between multiple genes and their products. The importance of such information is clear, not only as an aid to areas of research like drug design, but also as a contribution to our understanding of the mechanisms behind an organism's ability to react to its environment. RESULTS: We detail one computational approach for using gene expression data to identify response networks in an organism. The method is based on the construction of biological networks given different sets of interaction information and the reduction of the said networks to important response sub-networks via the integration of the gene expression data. As an application, the expression data of known stress responders and DNA repair genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is used to construct a generic stress response sub-network. This is compared to similar networks constructed from data obtained from subjecting M.tuberculosis to various drugs; we are thus able to distinguish between generic stress response and specific drug response. We anticipate that this approach will be able to accelerate target identification and drug development for tuberculosis in the future. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary Figures 1 through 6 on drug response networks and differential network analyses on cerulenin, chlorpromazine, ethionamide, ofloxacin, thiolactomycin and triclosan. Supplementary Tables 1 to 3 on predicted protein interactions. http://www.santafe.edu/~chris/DifferentialNW. Lawrence Cabusora, Electra Sutton, Andy W. Fulmer, Christian V. Forst |
Bioinform. | 2 |