Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arnaldo Hilário Viegas de Lima

dblp:96/2892 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › design data management
data models
0.011991
Design Version Management in the GARDEN Framework · DAC 1991
Electronic design automation
design representation
0.011991
Design Version Management in the GARDEN Framework · DAC 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

GARDEN framework · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1991 Design Version Management in the GARDEN Framework
abstract
ii data model for representing complex design objects and supporting design version management is among the most important features of design frameworks.Although most of the existing frameworks allow a correct representation of modularity and hierarchy, they do not offer powerful and flexible mechanisms for supporting all dimensions of the design evolution process (views at various abstraction levels, alternate design solutions, and revisions for each alternative /vie\v) and the relationships between them.In this paper, the data model of the GARDEN framework is presented, and it is shown why it is superior to other existing approaches regarding design version management.
Flávio Rech Wagner, Arnaldo Hilário Viegas de Lima
DAC2