Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yu Liu 0168
dblp:97/2274-168
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-3881-462XORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Network security · 47% Privacy and data protection · 32% Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 22% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Network measurement and analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
de-anonymization |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Time Tells All: Deanonymization of Blockchain RPC Users with Zero Transaction Fee · CCS 2025 Deanonymizing Ethereum Users behind Third-Party RPC Services · INFOCOM 2024 |
Network security
traffic analysis |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Time Tells All: Deanonymization of Blockchain RPC Users with Zero Transaction Fee · CCS 2025 Deanonymizing Ethereum Users behind Third-Party RPC Services · INFOCOM 2024 |
Network security
anonymity networks |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Deanonymizing Ethereum Users behind Third-Party RPC Services · INFOCOM 2024 |
Network measurement and analytics › internet measurement
blockchain network measurement |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Time Tells All: Deanonymization of Blockchain RPC Users with Zero Transaction Fee · CCS 2025 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › blockchain protocols
ethereum |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Deanonymizing Ethereum Users behind Third-Party RPC Services · INFOCOM 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
temporal correlation analysis · 1.7passive network monitoring · 1.7statistical correlation · 0.8empirical measurement · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Time Tells All: Deanonymization of Blockchain RPC Users with Zero Transaction FeeabstractRemote Procedure Call (RPC) services have become a primary gateway for users to access public blockchains. While they offer significant convenience, RPC services also introduce critical privacy challenges that remain insufficiently examined. Existing deanonymization attacks either do not apply to blockchain RPC users or incur costs like transaction fees assuming an active network eavesdropper. In this paper, we propose a novel deanonymization attack that can link an IP address of a RPC user to this user's blockchain pseudonym. Our analysis reveals a temporal correlation between the timestamps of transaction confirmations recorded on the public ledger and those of TCP packets sent by the victim when querying transaction status. We assume a strong passive adversary with access to network infrastructure, capable of monitoring traffic at network border routers or Internet exchange points. By monitoring network traffic and analyzing public ledgers, the attacker can link the IP address of the TCP packet to the pseudonym of the transaction initiator by exploiting the temporal correlation. This deanonymization attack incurs zero transaction fee. We mathematically model and analyze the attack method, perform large-scale measurements of blockchain ledgers, and conduct real-world attacks to validate the attack. Our attack achieves a high success rate of over 95% against normal RPC users on various blockchain networks, including Ethereum, Bitcoin and Solana. Shan Wang 0008, Ming Yang 0001, Yu Liu 0168, Yue Zhang 0025, Shuaiqing Zhang, Zhen Ling 0001, Jiannong Cao 0001, Xinwen Fu |
CCS | 3 |
| 2024 | Deanonymizing Ethereum Users behind Third-Party RPC ServicesabstractThird-party RPC services have become the mainstream way for users to access Ethereum. In this paper, we present a novel deanonymization attack that can link an Ethereum address to a real-world identity such as IP address of a user who accesses Ethereum via a third-party RPC service. We find that RPC API calls result in distinguishable sizes of encrypted TCP packets. An attacker can then find when a user sends a transaction to an RPC provider and immediately send a beacon transaction after the user transaction. By exploiting the differences in the distributions of inter-arrival time intervals of normal transactions and two simultaneously initiated transactions, the attacker can identify the victim transaction in the Ethereum network. This enables the attacker to correlate the Ethereum address of the victim transaction’s initiator with the source IP address of TCP packets from a victim user. We model the attack through empirical measurements and conduct extensive real-world experiments to validate the effectiveness of our attack. With three optimization strategies, the correlation accuracy can reach to 98.70% and 96.60% respectively in Ethereum testnet and mainnet. We are the first to study the deanonymization of Ethereum users behind third-party RPC services. Shan Wang 0008, Ming Yang 0001, Wenxuan Dai, Yu Liu 0168, Yue Zhang 0025, Xinwen Fu |
INFOCOM | 4 |